Compare CPU 2023
Our CPU comparison with benchmarks is not just a simple processor ranking list, but also helps you to compare two processors with each other very easily. In addition to the CPU benchmarks, you will also find all the important technical data of the processors here. It has never been so easy to find a suitable processor, whether for a desktop, notebook or smartphone!Do some research in our numerous tables or search directly for a specific processor. We sorted the CPUs according to performance in the benchmarks, energy consumption and price.
CPU Benchmarks
Beside of technical cpu data, cpu-monkey is able to show the real cpu speed to you. We're using a bunch of favorite benchmarking software to realize that:
Cinebench R23 (SC)
503 entries
503 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
480 entries
480 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
633 entries
633 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
580 entries
580 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,597 entries
1,597 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,546 entries
1,546 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,357 entries
2,357 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,330 entries
2,330 entries
FP32 SP iGPU
1,871 entries
1,871 entries
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
85 entries
85 entries
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
118 entries
118 entries
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
211 entries
211 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,290 entries
2,290 entries
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
190 entries
190 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (SC)
216 entries
216 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
719 entries
719 entries
Monero Hashrate
94 entries
94 entries
V-Ray CPU-Render
248 entries
248 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,098 entries
1,098 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,093 entries
1,093 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
941 entries
941 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
937 entries
937 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
825 entries
825 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
836 entries
836 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
CPU groups
We have clearly divided all processors available in our benchmark database into groups for you. For example, all Intel Core i7 processors can be compared at a glance. In addition, all CPUs of a generation are divided into subgroups.
AMD Athlon
27 entries
27 entries
AMD Ryzen 3
31 entries
31 entries
AMD Ryzen 5
65 entries
65 entries
AMD Ryzen 7
56 entries
56 entries
AMD Ryzen 9
30 entries
30 entries
AMD Ryzen Threadripper
10 entries
10 entries
Apple A series
21 entries
21 entries
Apple M series
17 entries
17 entries
Intel Celeron
150 entries
150 entries
Intel Core i3
197 entries
197 entries
Intel Core i5
314 entries
314 entries
Intel Core i7
284 entries
284 entries
Intel Core i9
70 entries
70 entries
Intel Pentium
149 entries
149 entries
More CPU groups
show more results
show more results
Our latest CPU news and articles
Why the new AMD Ryzen 7000 processors for the AM5 socket are currently not a good deal
Posted by Stefan on 2022-10-11
At the end of September 2022, the time had come: AMD presented its latest desktop processors called AMD Ryzen 7000. Initially, 4 processors with 6 to 16 CPU cores were released.
The new socket AM5 (LGA 1718) is used for the first time, which is intended to replace the very durable socket AM4 introduced in 2017 as AMDs mainstream platform. This includes (depending on the chipset) PCIe 5.0 support as well as the exclusive use of DDR5 memory on all AM5 mainboards.
Officially, DDR5-5200 is the maximum, but with AMDs EXPO Technology which is similar to Intel's XMP 3.0, AMD now also has a solution for easy overclocking of the main memory. AMD itself names DDR5-6000 as the sweet spot for the new AMD Ryzen 7000 processors.
The new socket AM5 (LGA 1718) is used for the first time, which is intended to replace the very durable socket AM4 introduced in 2017 as AMDs mainstream platform. This includes (depending on the chipset) PCIe 5.0 support as well as the exclusive use of DDR5 memory on all AM5 mainboards.
Officially, DDR5-5200 is the maximum, but with AMDs EXPO Technology which is similar to Intel's XMP 3.0, AMD now also has a solution for easy overclocking of the main memory. AMD itself names DDR5-6000 as the sweet spot for the new AMD Ryzen 7000 processors.
MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ vs Apple A16 and Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
Posted by Stefan on 2022-09-22
With the Dimensity 9000+, Mediatek presents the latest of its smartphone chips. The successor to the Mediatek Dimensity 9000 achieves higher CPU and GPU clock frequencies thanks to better binning. The CPU clock of the prime core (A core) increases from 3.0 to 3.2 GHz. And the ARM Mali-G710 MP10 GPU can now clock at 0.9 GHz (previously 0.85 GHz).
Both are a good improvement over the Dimensity 9000 in theory but the increase in performance should not usually be noticeable in practice. In the end, the overall performance of the Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ is impressive: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is beaten in Geekbench 5 in both the single-core and multi-core benchmarks.
Both are a good improvement over the Dimensity 9000 in theory but the increase in performance should not usually be noticeable in practice. In the end, the overall performance of the Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ is impressive: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is beaten in Geekbench 5 in both the single-core and multi-core benchmarks.
The evolution of AMD Ryzen processors
Posted by Stefan on 2022-09-06
The AMD Ryzen processors are designed for the mid to high-end range and are grouped into the Ryzen 3, Ryzen 5, Ryzen 7 and Ryzen 9 classes. AMD follows the market leader Intel, which groups its Core i series (Intel Core i3, Core i5, Core i7 and Core i9) identically.
The AMD Ryzen processors were first introduced by AMD in Q1 2017. They are the successor to the not particularly successful AMD Bulldozer processors. The latter were manufactured using an outdated manufacturing process and could not keep up with the competing products from Intel. AMD lost a large portion of its desktop processor market share during this period.
The AMD Ryzen processors were first introduced by AMD in Q1 2017. They are the successor to the not particularly successful AMD Bulldozer processors. The latter were manufactured using an outdated manufacturing process and could not keep up with the competing products from Intel. AMD lost a large portion of its desktop processor market share during this period.
Leaderboards
In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.
The best desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best AMD desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best Intel desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best mobile processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best smartphone processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best gaming CPU
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Fastest integrated graphics ever
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
CPU with the best price/performance ratio
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Leaderboards
show more results
show more results
AMD CPUsAMD manufactures its current AMD Ryzen 7000 processors with Zen 4 CPU cores using a modern 5 nm process. The production takes place at the contract manufacturer TSMC. The new AMD Ryzen processors are based on the new AM5 socket from AMD and still have a classic core structure with CPU cores of the same size. The integrated graphics units (iGPUs) of the current AMD Rembrandt mobile processors such as the AMD Radeon RX 680M is approx. 40 percent faster than in comparable Intel Alder-Lake mobile processors that rely on the Intel Iris Xe Graphics (96 EUs). |
Intel CPUs
Intel's new 13th generation Intel Core i desktop processors (Raptor Lake) are able to increase the CPU performance significantly and occupy the TOP positions in most benchmarks. Since the end of 2021, Intel has been using a hybrid core structure for its desktop processors, in which fast P cores work together with more economical but also slower E cores in a tandem. This principle has long been used successfully in mobile processors by other manufacturers such as Apple or Qualcomm. |
Last 20 CPU comparisons
Trends - The 20 most popular CPUs last month
| 1. |
|
Apple M1 8C 8T @ 3.20 GHz |
225,652 clicks | |
| 2. |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6C 12T @ 3.70 GHz |
180,934 clicks | |
| 3. |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G 6C 12T @ 3.90 GHz |
170,666 clicks | |
| 4. |
|
Intel Core i5-1235U 10C 12T @ 1.30 GHz |
162,144 clicks | |
| 5. |
|
Apple M2 8C 8T @ 3.50 GHz |
158,954 clicks | |
| 6. |
|
Intel Core i5-1135G7 4C 8T @ 2.40 GHz |
157,227 clicks | |
| 7. |
|
Intel Core i7-12700H 14C 20T @ 2.30 GHz |
149,062 clicks | |
| 8. |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz |
145,781 clicks | |
| 9. |
|
Intel Celeron N5105 4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
144,546 clicks | |
| 10. |
|
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8C 16T @ 3.40 GHz |
134,804 clicks | |
| 11. |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U 6C 12T @ 2.10 GHz |
132,259 clicks | |
| 12. |
|
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8C 16T @ 3.80 GHz |
130,212 clicks | |
| 13. |
|
Intel Core i9-13900K 24C 32T @ 3.00 GHz |
125,092 clicks | |
| 14. |
|
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 8C 16T @ 3.20 GHz |
120,804 clicks | |
| 15. |
|
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G 8C 16T @ 3.80 GHz |
120,110 clicks | |
| 16. |
|
Intel Celeron J4125 4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
119,136 clicks | |
| 17. |
|
Intel Core i5-13600K 14C 20T @ 3.50 GHz |
115,910 clicks | |
| 18. |
|
Intel Core i7-1255U 10C 12T @ 1.70 GHz |
113,599 clicks | |
| 19. |
|
Intel Core i7-1260P 12C 16T @ 2.10 GHz |
112,278 clicks | |
| 20. |
|
Intel Core i7-13700K 16C 24T @ 3.40 GHz |
110,449 clicks |
TOP 10 CPU-Comparisons by clicks
| 1. |
| Apple M1 vs Intel Core i9-9900K | 506,645 clicks |
| 2. |
| Apple M1 vs Apple A14 Bionic | 398,751 clicks |
| 3. |
| Intel Core i5-1135G7 vs AMD Ryzen 5 5500U | 309,076 clicks |
| 4. |
| AMD Ryzen 7 3700X vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 301,481 clicks |
| 5. |
| Intel Core i7-7500U vs Intel Core i5-7200U | 278,331 clicks |
| 6. |
| Apple A14 Bionic vs Apple A12Z Bionic | 262,332 clicks |
| 7. |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500U vs Intel Core i5-8265U | 261,758 clicks |
| 8. |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 245,057 clicks |
| 9. |
| Apple M1 vs Intel Core i7-10875H | 227,647 clicks |
| 10. |
| Apple M1 vs Intel Core i5-1038NG7 | 219,807 clicks |
TOP 10 CPUs by benchmark results
| 1. |
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 64C 128T @ 2.70 GHz |
127,000 points | |
| 2. |
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 64C 128T @ 2.70 GHz |
120,099 points | |
| 3. |
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64C 128T @ 2.90 GHz |
119,709 points | |
| 4. |
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32C 64T @ 3.60 GHz |
104,408 points | |
| 5. |
|
AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz |
94,205 points | |
| 6. |
|
AMD EPYC 7763 64C 128T @ 2.45 GHz |
92,692 points | |
| 7. |
|
AMD EPYC 7702P 64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz |
91,336 points | |
| 8. |
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32C 64T @ 3.70 GHz |
86,420 points | |
| 9. |
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 32C 64T @ 3.50 GHz |
84,293 points | |
| 10. |
|
Intel Core i9-13900KS 24C 32T @ 3.20 GHz |
83,764 points |
The 10 most expensive CPUs
| 1. |
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8276L 28C 56T @ 2.20 GHz |
16,616 $ | |
| 2. |
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 28C 56T @ 2.50 GHz |
13,000 $ | |
| 3. |
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M 28C 56T @ 2.50 GHz |
13,000 $ | |
| 4. |
|
AMD EPYC 9654 96C 192T @ 2.40 GHz |
11,805 $ | |
| 5. |
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8176F 28C 56T @ 2.10 GHz |
11,800 $ | |
| 6. |
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8176M 28C 56T @ 2.10 GHz |
11,700 $ | |
| 7. |
|
AMD EPYC 9654P 96C 192T @ 2.40 GHz |
10,625 $ | |
| 8. |
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M 26C 52T @ 2.10 GHz |
10,400 $ | |
| 9. |
|
AMD EPYC 9634 84C 168T @ 2.25 GHz |
10,304 $ | |
| 10. |
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 28C 56T @ 2.70 GHz |
10,009 $ |
The 10 keen CPUs
| 1. |
|
Intel Atom Z3735G 4C 4T @ 1.33 GHz |
17 $ | |
| 2. |
|
Intel Atom x5-Z8300 4C 4T @ 1.44 GHz |
18 $ | |
| 3. |
|
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 4C 4T @ 1.44 GHz |
18 $ | |
| 4. |
|
Intel Atom Z3736F 4C 4T @ 1.33 GHz |
20 $ | |
| 5. |
|
Intel Atom x5-Z8330 4C 4T @ 1.44 GHz |
20 $ | |
| 6. |
|
Intel Atom x5-Z8500 4C 4T @ 1.44 GHz |
23 $ | |
| 7. |
|
Intel Atom x5-Z8550 4C 4T @ 1.44 GHz |
23 $ | |
| 8. |
|
AMD Sempron 2650 2C 2T @ 1.45 GHz |
26 $ | |
| 9. |
|
AMD A4-3400 2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz |
28 $ | |
| 10. |
|
AMD Athlon II X2 340 2C 2T @ 3.20 GHz |
30 $ |
The 10 most energy efficient CPUs (by TDP)
| 1. |
|
Intel Atom x7-Z8700 4C 4T @ 1.60 GHz |
2.0 W TDP | |
| 2. |
|
Intel Atom x5-Z8300 4C 4T @ 1.44 GHz |
2.0 W TDP | |
| 3. |
|
Intel Atom x5-Z8500 4C 4T @ 1.44 GHz |
2.0 W TDP | |
| 4. |
|
Intel Atom x7-Z8750 4C 4T @ 1.60 GHz |
2.0 W TDP | |
| 5. |
|
Intel Atom x5-Z8550 4C 4T @ 1.44 GHz |
2.0 W TDP | |
| 6. |
|
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 4C 4T @ 1.44 GHz |
2.0 W TDP | |
| 7. |
|
Intel Atom x5-Z8330 4C 4T @ 1.44 GHz |
2.0 W TDP | |
| 8. |
|
Intel Atom Z550 1C 1T @ 2.00 GHz |
2.4 W TDP | |
| 9. |
|
Intel Atom E3805 2C 2T @ 1.33 GHz |
3.0 W TDP | |
| 10. |
|
Intel Atom Z2420 1C 2T @ 1.20 GHz |
3.0 W TDP |
