Compare CPU 2023
Our CPU comparison with benchmarks is not just a simple processor ranking list, but also helps you to compare two processors with each other very easily. In addition to the CPU benchmarks, you will also find all the important technical data of the processors here. It has never been so easy to find a suitable processor, whether for a desktop, notebook or smartphone!Do some research in our numerous tables or search directly for a specific processor. We sorted the CPUs according to performance in the benchmarks, energy consumption and price.
CPU Benchmarks
Beside of technical cpu data, cpu-monkey is able to show the real cpu speed to you. We're using a bunch of favorite benchmarking software to realize that:
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
177 entries
177 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
178 entries
178 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
527 entries
527 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
504 entries
504 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,398 entries
2,398 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,371 entries
2,371 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,646 entries
1,646 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,597 entries
1,597 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
641 entries
641 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
588 entries
588 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
1,925 entries
1,925 entries
3DMark Timespy (iGPU)
478 entries
478 entries
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
85 entries
85 entries
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
118 entries
118 entries
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
212 entries
212 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,319 entries
2,319 entries
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
190 entries
190 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (SC)
222 entries
222 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
725 entries
725 entries
Monero Hashrate
94 entries
94 entries
V-Ray CPU-Render
249 entries
249 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,102 entries
1,102 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,097 entries
1,097 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
941 entries
941 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
937 entries
937 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
825 entries
825 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
836 entries
836 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
AI / ML Performance
50 entries
50 entries
CPU groups
We have clearly divided all processors available in our benchmark database into groups for you. For example, all Intel Core i7 processors can be compared at a glance. In addition, all CPUs of a generation are divided into subgroups.
AMD Athlon
29 entries
29 entries
AMD Ryzen 3
31 entries
31 entries
AMD Ryzen 5
69 entries
69 entries
AMD Ryzen 7
57 entries
57 entries
AMD Ryzen 9
32 entries
32 entries
AMD Ryzen Threadripper
10 entries
10 entries
Apple A series
22 entries
22 entries
Apple M series
18 entries
18 entries
Intel Celeron
165 entries
165 entries
Intel Core i3
199 entries
199 entries
Intel Core i5
319 entries
319 entries
Intel Core i7
290 entries
290 entries
Intel Core i9
75 entries
75 entries
Intel Pentium
150 entries
150 entries
More CPU groups
show more results
show more results
Our latest CPU news and articles
Why the new AMD Ryzen 7000 processors for the AM5 socket are currently not a good deal
Posted by Stefan on 2022-10-11
At the end of September 2022, the time had come: AMD presented its latest desktop processors called AMD Ryzen 7000. Initially, 4 processors with 6 to 16 CPU cores were released.
The new socket AM5 (LGA 1718) is used for the first time, which is intended to replace the very durable socket AM4 introduced in 2017 as AMDs mainstream platform. This includes (depending on the chipset) PCIe 5.0 support as well as the exclusive use of DDR5 memory on all AM5 mainboards.
Officially, DDR5-5200 is the maximum, but with AMDs EXPO Technology which is similar to Intel's XMP 3.0, AMD now also has a solution for easy overclocking of the main memory. AMD itself names DDR5-6000 as the sweet spot for the new AMD Ryzen 7000 processors.
The new socket AM5 (LGA 1718) is used for the first time, which is intended to replace the very durable socket AM4 introduced in 2017 as AMDs mainstream platform. This includes (depending on the chipset) PCIe 5.0 support as well as the exclusive use of DDR5 memory on all AM5 mainboards.
Officially, DDR5-5200 is the maximum, but with AMDs EXPO Technology which is similar to Intel's XMP 3.0, AMD now also has a solution for easy overclocking of the main memory. AMD itself names DDR5-6000 as the sweet spot for the new AMD Ryzen 7000 processors.
MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ vs Apple A16 and Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
Posted by Stefan on 2022-09-22
With the Dimensity 9000+, Mediatek presents the latest of its smartphone chips. The successor to the Mediatek Dimensity 9000 achieves higher CPU and GPU clock frequencies thanks to better binning. The CPU clock of the prime core (A core) increases from 3.0 to 3.2 GHz. And the ARM Mali-G710 MP10 GPU can now clock at 0.9 GHz (previously 0.85 GHz).
Both are a good improvement over the Dimensity 9000 in theory but the increase in performance should not usually be noticeable in practice. In the end, the overall performance of the Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ is impressive: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is beaten in Geekbench 5 in both the single-core and multi-core benchmarks.
Both are a good improvement over the Dimensity 9000 in theory but the increase in performance should not usually be noticeable in practice. In the end, the overall performance of the Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ is impressive: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is beaten in Geekbench 5 in both the single-core and multi-core benchmarks.
The evolution of AMD Ryzen processors
Posted by Stefan on 2022-09-06
The AMD Ryzen processors are designed for the mid to high-end range and are grouped into the Ryzen 3, Ryzen 5, Ryzen 7 and Ryzen 9 classes. AMD follows the market leader Intel, which groups its Core i series (Intel Core i3, Core i5, Core i7 and Core i9) identically.
The AMD Ryzen processors were first introduced by AMD in Q1 2017. They are the successor to the not particularly successful AMD Bulldozer processors. The latter were manufactured using an outdated manufacturing process and could not keep up with the competing products from Intel. AMD lost a large portion of its desktop processor market share during this period.
The AMD Ryzen processors were first introduced by AMD in Q1 2017. They are the successor to the not particularly successful AMD Bulldozer processors. The latter were manufactured using an outdated manufacturing process and could not keep up with the competing products from Intel. AMD lost a large portion of its desktop processor market share during this period.
Leaderboards
In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.
The best desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best AMD desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best Intel desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best mobile processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best smartphone processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best gaming CPU
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Fastest integrated graphics ever
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
CPU with the best price/performance ratio
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Leaderboards
show more results
show more results
AMD CPUsAMD manufactures its current AMD Ryzen 7000 processors with Zen 4 CPU cores using a modern 5 nm process. The production takes place at the contract manufacturer TSMC. The new AMD Ryzen processors are based on the new AM5 socket from AMD and still have a classic core structure with CPU cores of the same size. The integrated graphics units (iGPUs) of the current AMD Rembrandt mobile processors such as the AMD Radeon RX 680M is approx. 40 percent faster than in comparable Intel Alder-Lake mobile processors that rely on the Intel Iris Xe Graphics (96 EUs). |
Intel CPUs
Intel's new 13th generation Intel Core i desktop processors (Raptor Lake) are able to increase the CPU performance significantly and occupy the TOP positions in most benchmarks. Since the end of 2021, Intel has been using a hybrid core structure for its desktop processors, in which fast P cores work together with more economical but also slower E cores in a tandem. This principle has long been used successfully in mobile processors by other manufacturers such as Apple or Qualcomm. |
Last 20 CPU comparisons
Trends - The 20 most popular CPUs last month
| 1. |
|
Intel Processor N100 4C 4T @ 1.80 GHz |
244,807 clicks | |
| 2. |
|
Apple M1 8C 8T @ 3.20 GHz |
221,915 clicks | |
| 3. |
|
Intel Core i5-1235U 10C 12T @ 1.30 GHz |
214,168 clicks | |
| 4. |
|
Apple M2 8C 8T @ 3.50 GHz |
196,381 clicks | |
| 5. |
|
Intel Core i5-1135G7 4C 8T @ 2.40 GHz |
171,567 clicks | |
| 6. |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6C 12T @ 3.70 GHz |
169,531 clicks | |
| 7. |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G 6C 12T @ 3.90 GHz |
168,437 clicks | |
| 8. |
|
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8C 16T @ 3.40 GHz |
157,983 clicks | |
| 9. |
|
Intel Core i7-12700H 14C 20T @ 2.30 GHz |
150,673 clicks | |
| 10. |
|
Intel Core i9-13900K 24C 32T @ 3.00 GHz |
149,134 clicks | |
| 11. |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz |
141,934 clicks | |
| 12. |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U 6C 12T @ 2.10 GHz |
137,896 clicks | |
| 13. |
|
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 8C 16T @ 3.20 GHz |
133,100 clicks | |
| 14. |
|
Intel Core i5-13600K 14C 20T @ 3.50 GHz |
132,751 clicks | |
| 15. |
|
Intel Core i7-13700K 16C 24T @ 3.40 GHz |
132,013 clicks | |
| 16. |
|
Intel Celeron N5105 4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
131,643 clicks | |
| 17. |
|
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8C 16T @ 3.80 GHz |
124,341 clicks | |
| 18. |
|
Intel Core i7-1255U 10C 12T @ 1.70 GHz |
122,137 clicks | |
| 19. |
|
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G 8C 16T @ 3.80 GHz |
112,080 clicks | |
| 20. |
|
Intel Core i5-12400 6C 12T @ 2.50 GHz |
112,007 clicks |
TOP 10 CPU-Comparisons by clicks
| 1. |
| Apple M1 vs Intel Core i9-9900K | 523,426 clicks |
| 2. |
| Apple M1 vs Apple A14 Bionic | 459,394 clicks |
| 3. |
| Intel Core i5-1135G7 vs AMD Ryzen 5 5500U | 330,790 clicks |
| 4. |
| AMD Ryzen 7 3700X vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 314,676 clicks |
| 5. |
| Intel Core i7-7500U vs Intel Core i5-7200U | 281,104 clicks |
| 6. |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 270,552 clicks |
| 7. |
| Apple A14 Bionic vs Apple A12Z Bionic | 269,290 clicks |
| 8. |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500U vs Intel Core i5-8265U | 266,854 clicks |
| 9. |
| Apple M1 vs Intel Core i7-10875H | 236,422 clicks |
| 10. |
| Apple M1 vs Intel Core i5-1038NG7 | 230,253 clicks |
TOP 10 CPUs by benchmark results
| 1. |
|
Intel Xeon w9-3495X 56C 112T @ 1.90 GHz |
137,995 points | |
| 2. |
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 64C 128T @ 2.70 GHz |
127,000 points | |
| 3. |
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 64C 128T @ 2.70 GHz |
120,099 points | |
| 4. |
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64C 128T @ 2.90 GHz |
119,709 points | |
| 5. |
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32C 64T @ 3.60 GHz |
104,408 points | |
| 6. |
|
AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz |
94,205 points | |
| 7. |
|
AMD EPYC 7763 64C 128T @ 2.45 GHz |
92,692 points | |
| 8. |
|
AMD EPYC 7702P 64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz |
91,336 points | |
| 9. |
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32C 64T @ 3.70 GHz |
86,420 points | |
| 10. |
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 32C 64T @ 3.50 GHz |
84,293 points |
The 10 most expensive CPUs
| 1. |
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H 60C 120T @ 1.90 GHz |
17,000 $ | |
| 2. |
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8276L 28C 56T @ 2.20 GHz |
16,616 $ | |
| 3. |
|
AMD EPYC 9684X 96C 192T @ 2.55 GHz |
14,756 $ | |
| 4. |
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8468H 48C 96T @ 2.10 GHz |
13,923 $ | |
| 5. |
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 28C 56T @ 2.50 GHz |
13,000 $ | |
| 6. |
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M 28C 56T @ 2.50 GHz |
13,000 $ | |
| 7. |
|
Intel Xeon CPU Max 9480 56C 112T @ 1.90 GHz |
12,980 $ | |
| 8. |
|
AMD EPYC 9734 112C 224T @ 2.20 GHz |
11,900 $ | |
| 9. |
|
AMD EPYC 9754 128C 256T @ 2.25 GHz |
11,900 $ | |
| 10. |
|
AMD EPYC 9654 96C 192T @ 2.40 GHz |
11,805 $ |
The 10 keen CPUs
| 1. |
|
Intel Atom Z3735G 4C 4T @ 1.33 GHz |
17 $ | |
| 2. |
|
Intel Atom x5-Z8300 4C 4T @ 1.44 GHz |
18 $ | |
| 3. |
|
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 4C 4T @ 1.44 GHz |
18 $ | |
| 4. |
|
Intel Atom Z3736F 4C 4T @ 1.33 GHz |
20 $ | |
| 5. |
|
Intel Atom x5-Z8330 4C 4T @ 1.44 GHz |
20 $ | |
| 6. |
|
Intel Atom x5-Z8500 4C 4T @ 1.44 GHz |
23 $ | |
| 7. |
|
Intel Atom x5-Z8550 4C 4T @ 1.44 GHz |
23 $ | |
| 8. |
|
AMD Sempron 2650 2C 2T @ 1.45 GHz |
26 $ | |
| 9. |
|
AMD A4-3400 2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz |
28 $ | |
| 10. |
|
AMD Athlon II X2 340 2C 2T @ 3.20 GHz |
30 $ |
The 10 most energy efficient CPUs (by TDP)
| 1. |
|
Intel Atom x7-Z8700 4C 4T @ 1.60 GHz |
2.0 W TDP | |
| 2. |
|
Intel Atom x5-Z8300 4C 4T @ 1.44 GHz |
2.0 W TDP | |
| 3. |
|
Intel Atom x5-Z8500 4C 4T @ 1.44 GHz |
2.0 W TDP | |
| 4. |
|
Intel Atom x7-Z8750 4C 4T @ 1.60 GHz |
2.0 W TDP | |
| 5. |
|
Intel Atom x5-Z8550 4C 4T @ 1.44 GHz |
2.0 W TDP | |
| 6. |
|
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 4C 4T @ 1.44 GHz |
2.0 W TDP | |
| 7. |
|
Intel Atom x5-Z8330 4C 4T @ 1.44 GHz |
2.0 W TDP | |
| 8. |
|
Intel Atom Z550 1C 1T @ 2.00 GHz |
2.4 W TDP | |
| 9. |
|
Intel Atom E3805 2C 2T @ 1.33 GHz |
3.0 W TDP | |
| 10. |
|
Intel Atom Z2420 1C 2T @ 1.20 GHz |
3.0 W TDP |
