Intel Xeon W-3375 vs AMD EPYC 7352

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Xeon W-3375 CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD EPYC 7352
Intel Xeon W-3375 AMD EPYC 7352

CPU comparison

Intel Xeon W-3375 or AMD EPYC 7352 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Intel Xeon W-3375 has 38 cores with 72 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.00 GHz. Up to 4096 GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The Intel Xeon W-3375 was released in Q3/2021.

The AMD EPYC 7352 has 24 cores with 48 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7352 was released in Q3/2019.
Intel Xeon W (83) Family AMD EPYC (129)
Intel Xeon W-3300 (5) CPU group AMD EPYC 7002 (24)
8 Generation 2
Ice Lake W Architecture Rome (Zen 2)
Desktop / Server Segment Desktop / Server
Intel Xeon W-3275 Predecessor --
Intel Xeon w9-3475X Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Xeon W-3375 has 38 CPU cores and can calculate 72 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon W-3375 is 2.50 GHz (4.00 GHz) while the AMD EPYC 7352 has 24 CPU cores and 48 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7352 is at 2.30 GHz (3.20 GHz).

Intel Xeon W-3375 Characteristic AMD EPYC 7352
38 Cores 24
72 Threads 48
normal Core architecture normal
Yes Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
2.50 GHz Frequency 2.30 GHz
4.00 GHz Turbo Frequency (1 Core) 3.20 GHz
3.20 GHz Turbo Frequency (All Cores) 2.70 GHz

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Intel Xeon W-3375 Characteristic AMD EPYC 7352
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

The Intel Xeon W-3375 or AMD EPYC 7352 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

no iGPU GPU no iGPU
GPU frequency --
-- GPU (Turbo) --
-- GPU Generation --
Technology
Max. displays
-- Compute units --
-- Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
-- DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU no iGPU
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
No Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The Intel Xeon W-3375 can use up to 4096 GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 204.8 GB/s. The AMD EPYC 7352 supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s.

Intel Xeon W-3375 Characteristic AMD EPYC 7352
DDR4-3200 Memory DDR4-3200
4096 GB Max. Memory
8 (Octa Channel) Memory channels 8 (Octa Channel)
204.8 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
Yes ECC Yes
47.50 MB L2 Cache --
57.00 MB L3 Cache 128.00 MB
4.0 PCIe version 4.0
64 PCIe lanes 128
126.0 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth 252.0 GB/s

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Xeon W-3375 is 270 W, while the AMD EPYC 7352 has a TDP of 155 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

Intel Xeon W-3375 Characteristic AMD EPYC 7352
270 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 155 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Xeon W-3375 is manufactured in 10 nm and has 104.50 MB cache. The AMD EPYC 7352 is manufactured in 7 nm and has a 128.00 MB cache.

Intel Xeon W-3375 Characteristic AMD EPYC 7352
10 nm Technology 7 nm
Monolithic Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 ISA extensions SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
LGA 4189 Socket SP3
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization AMD-V, SVM
Yes AES-NI Yes
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q3/2021 Release date Q3/2019
4499 $ Release price 2750 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Xeon W-3375 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 7352 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3375 (100%)
AMD EPYC 7352 (65%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3375 (100%)
AMD EPYC 7352 (64%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon W-3375 Intel Xeon W-3375
38C 72T @ 4.00 GHz
1324 (100%)
AMD EPYC 7352 AMD EPYC 7352
24C 48T @ 3.20 GHz
861 (65%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Xeon W-3375 Intel Xeon W-3375
38C 72T @ 3.20 GHz
27049 (100%)
AMD EPYC 7352 AMD EPYC 7352
24C 48T @ 2.70 GHz
15345 (57%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Xeon W-3375 Intel Xeon W-3375
38C 72T @ 3.20 GHz
59028 (100%)
AMD EPYC 7352 AMD EPYC 7352
24C 48T @ 2.70 GHz
41286 (70%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon W-3375 Intel Xeon W-3375
38C 72T @ 4.00 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7352 AMD EPYC 7352
24C 48T @ 3.20 GHz
375 (100%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Xeon W-3375 AMD EPYC 7352
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Core i9-13900KIntel Xeon W-3375 Intel Core i9-13900K vs Intel Xeon W-3375
2. AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WXIntel Xeon W-3375 AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs Intel Xeon W-3375
3. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990XIntel Xeon W-3375 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Intel Xeon W-3375
4. AMD EPYC 7352AMD EPYC 7402 AMD EPYC 7352 vs AMD EPYC 7402
5. Intel Xeon Silver 4110AMD EPYC 7352 Intel Xeon Silver 4110 vs AMD EPYC 7352
6. AMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD EPYC 7352 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X vs AMD EPYC 7352
7. Intel Xeon Platinum 8160AMD EPYC 7352 Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 vs AMD EPYC 7352
8. Intel Xeon W-3375Intel Xeon W-3175X Intel Xeon W-3375 vs Intel Xeon W-3175X
9. AMD EPYC 7352AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X AMD EPYC 7352 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
10. Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300AMD EPYC 7352 Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 vs AMD EPYC 7352


back to index