Intel Xeon w9-3475X Benchmark, Test and specs
Last updated:
The Intel Xeon w9-3475X has 36 cores with 72 threads and is based on the 12. gen of the Intel Xeon W series. The processor uses a mainboard with the LGA 4677 socket and was released in Q1/2023. The Intel Xeon w9-3475X scores 1,814 points in the Geekbench 5 single-core benchmark. In the Geekbench 5 multi-core benchmark, the result is 44,869 points.
CPU lineageThe segment in which we have classified the Intel Xeon w9-3475X. Here you can see if it is a desktop processor or a mobile processor or which processor may be the successor of the Intel Xeon w9-3475X. |
|
| Name: | Intel Xeon w9-3475X |
| Family: | Intel Xeon W |
| CPU group: | Intel Xeon W-3400 |
| Segment: | Desktop / Server |
| Generation: | 12 |
| Predecessor: | Intel Xeon W-3375 |
| Successor: | -- |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
The Intel Xeon w9-3475X has 36 CPU cores and can calculate 72 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon w9-3475X is 2.20 GHz (4.80 GHz). The number of CPU cores greatly affects the speed of the processor and is an important performance indicator.
| CPU Cores / Threads: | 36 / 72 |
| Core architecture: | normal |
| Cores: | 36x |
| Hyperthreading / SMT: | Yes |
| Overclocking: | Yes |
| Frequency: | 2.20 GHz |
| Turbo Frequency (1 Core): | 4.80 GHz |
| Turbo Frequency (36 Cores): | 3.00 GHz |
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
| AI hardware: | -- |
| AI specifications: | -- |
Memory & PCIeThe processor can use up to 4096 GB memory in 8 (Octa Channel) memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 307.2 GB/s. The memory type as well as the amount of memory can greatly affect the speed of the system. |
|
| Memory type: | DDR5-4800 |
| Max. Memory: | 4096 GB |
| Memory channels: | 8 (Octa Channel) |
| Bandwidth: | 307.2 GB/s |
| ECC: | Yes |
| PCIe: | 5.0 x 112 |
| AES-NI: | Yes |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the processor is 300 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. The TDP usually gives a rough idea of the actual power consumption of the CPU. |
|
| TDP (PL1 / PBP): | 300 W |
| TDP (PL2): | -- |
| TDP up: | 360 W |
| TDP down: | -- |
| Tjunction max.: | 95 °C |
Technical details
The Intel Xeon w9-3475X is made in 10 nm. The smaller the manufacturing process of a CPU, the more modern and energy-efficient it is. Overall, the processor has 82.50 MB cache. A large cache can greatly speed up the processor's speed in some cases such as games.
| Technology: | 10 nm |
| Chip design: | Monolithic |
| Socket: | LGA 4677 |
| L2-Cache: | -- |
| L3-Cache: | 82.50 MB |
| Architecture: | Sapphire Rapids-WS |
| Operating systems: | Windows 11, Windows Server, Linux |
| Virtualization: | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d, VT-rp, vPro Enterprise |
| Instruction set (ISA): | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions: | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, AMX |
| Release date: | Q1/2023 |
| Release price: | 3739 $ |
| Part Number: | -- |
| Documents: | Technical data sheet |
36C 72T @ 2.20 GHz (4.80 GHz)
buy now on Amazon and save!
Benchmark results
The benchmark results for the Intel Xeon w9-3475X have been carefully checked by us. We only publish benchmark results that have been created by us or that have been submitted by a visitor and then checked by a team member. All results are based on and fullfill our benchmark guidelines.
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
Apple M1
8C 8T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 (7-GPU)
8C 8T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon E-2386G
6C 12T @ 5.10 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon w9-3475X
36C 72T @ 4.80 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core i5-12500
6C 12T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-13600T
14C 20T @ 4.80 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core i7-12700TE
12C 20T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
AMD EPYC 9554
64C 128T @ 3.75 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9654
96C 192T @ 3.55 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9654P
96C 192T @ 3.55 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon w9-3475X
36C 72T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core i9-13900KS
24C 32T @ 5.60 GHz |
||
|
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
16C 32T @ 5.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900KF
24C 32T @ 5.50 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
Intel Xeon W-1350
6C 12T @ 5.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E-2386G
6C 12T @ 5.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E-2378
8C 16T @ 4.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon w9-3475X
36C 72T @ 4.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-12500
6C 12T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-13600T
14C 20T @ 4.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i7-11700KF
8C 16T @ 5.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
56C 112T @ 2.90 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7713
64C 128T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7773X
64C 128T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon w9-3475X
36C 72T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7763
64C 128T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
64C 128T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7713P
64C 128T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.|
|
AMD EPYC 7643
48C 96T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
32C 64T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon w9-3475X
36C 72T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 75F3
32C 64T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7543P
32C 64T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,597 entries
1,597 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,546 entries
1,546 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,357 entries
2,357 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,330 entries
2,330 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,290 entries
2,290 entries
Leaderboards
In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.
The best desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best AMD desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best Intel desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best mobile processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best smartphone processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best gaming CPU
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Fastest integrated graphics ever
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
CPU with the best price/performance ratio
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Leaderboards
show more results
show more results
Popular comparisons
