Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) vs Samsung Exynos 2100

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) CPU1 vs CPU2 Samsung Exynos 2100
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Samsung Exynos 2100

CPU comparison

Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) or Samsung Exynos 2100 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) has 10 cores with 10 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.50 GHz. Up to 32 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) was released in Q1/2023.

The Samsung Exynos 2100 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.90 GHz. The CPU supports up to 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 2100 was released in Q1/2021.
Apple M series (25) Family Samsung Exynos (47)
Apple M2 (8) CPU group Samsung Exynos 2100 (1)
2 Generation 5
M2 Architecture Cortex-X1/-A78/-A55
Mobile Segment Mobile
Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU) Predecessor --
Apple M3 Pro (11-CPU 14-GPU) Successor Samsung Exynos 2200

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) has 10 CPU cores and can calculate 10 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) is 0.66 GHz (3.50 GHz) while the Samsung Exynos 2100 has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 2100 is at 2.90 GHz.

Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2100
10 Cores 8
10 Threads 8
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
0.66 GHz (3.50 GHz)
6x Avalanche
A-Core 2.90 GHz
1x Cortex-X1
0.60 GHz (2.42 GHz)
4x Blizzard
B-Core 2.80 GHz
3x Cortex-A78
-- C-Core 2.20 GHz
4x Cortex-A55

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2100
Apple Neural Engine AI hardware --
16 Neural cores @ 15.8 TOPS AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) or Samsung Exynos 2100 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

Apple M2 Pro (16 Core) GPU ARM Mali-G78 MP14
0.45 GHz GPU frequency 0.76 GHz
1.40 GHz GPU (Turbo) --
2 GPU Generation Vallhall 2
5 nm Technology 5 nm
3 Max. displays 1
256 Compute units 14
2048 Shader 224
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
32 GB Max. GPU Memory --
-- DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Apple M2 Pro (16 Core) GPU ARM Mali-G78 MP14
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 Decode
Decode Codec AVC Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VC-1 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) can use up to 32 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 102.4 GB/s. The Samsung Exynos 2100 supports up to 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s.

Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2100
LPDDR5-6400 Memory LPDDR5-6400
32 GB Max. Memory 12 GB
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 4 (Quad Channel)
102.4 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
No ECC No
28.00 MB L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache --
4.0 PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) is 30 W, while the Samsung Exynos 2100 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2100
30 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
100 °C Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) is manufactured in 5 nm and has 28.00 MB cache. The Samsung Exynos 2100 is manufactured in 5 nm and has a 0.00 MB cache.

Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2100
5 nm Technology 5 nm
Chiplet Chip design Unknown
Armv8.5-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
Rosetta 2 x86-Emulation ISA extensions --
-- Socket --
Apple Virtualization Framework Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
macOS, iPadOS Operating systems Android
Q1/2023 Release date Q1/2021
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.9 stars (32 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 2100 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.9 stars (10 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2100 (52%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2100 (27%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C 10T @ 3.50 GHz
1874 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2100 Samsung Exynos 2100
8C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
1011 (54%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C 10T @ 3.50 GHz
12224 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2100 Samsung Exynos 2100
8C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
3355 (27%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C 10T @ 3.50 GHz
2689 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2100 Samsung Exynos 2100
8C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
1334 (50%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C 10T @ 3.50 GHz
12084 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2100 Samsung Exynos 2100
8C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
3339 (28%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
Apple M2 Pro (16 Core) @ 1.40 GHz
5680 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2100 Samsung Exynos 2100
ARM Mali-G78 MP14 @ 0.76 GHz
1360 (24%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C 10T @ 3.50 GHz
21532 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2100 Samsung Exynos 2100
8C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
5308 (25%)

Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)

The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C 10T @ 3.50 GHz
122 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2100 Samsung Exynos 2100
8C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)

The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C 10T @ 3.50 GHz
782 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2100 Samsung Exynos 2100
8C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C 10T @ 3.50 GHz
1695 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2100 Samsung Exynos 2100
8C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C 10T @ 3.50 GHz
12125 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2100 Samsung Exynos 2100
8C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C 10T @ 0.66 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 2100 Samsung Exynos 2100
8C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
724660 (100%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C 10T @ 0.66 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 2100 Samsung Exynos 2100
8C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
602990 (100%)

CPU performance per watt (efficiency)

Efficiency of the processor under full load in the Cinebench R23 (multi-core) benchmark. The benchmark result is divided by the average energy required (CPU package power in watts). The higher the value, the more efficient the CPU is under full load.
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
12,125 CB R23 MC @ 30 W
404 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2100 Samsung Exynos 2100
2.90 GHz
0 (0%)

Performance for Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. The performance is given in the number (trillions) of arithmetic operations per second (TOPS).
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C 10T @ 0.66 GHz
15.8 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2100 Samsung Exynos 2100
8C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Samsung Exynos 2100
Apple MacBook Pro 14 (2023)
Apple mac mini (2023)
Samsung Galaxy S21
Samsung Galaxy S21 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888Samsung Exynos 2100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
2. Apple M3Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Apple M3 vs Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
3. Samsung Exynos 2100Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
4. Apple A14 BionicSamsung Exynos 2100 Apple A14 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2100
5. Apple M2 Pro (12-CPU 19-GPU)Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Apple M2 Pro (12-CPU 19-GPU) vs Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
6. Samsung Exynos 990Samsung Exynos 2100 Samsung Exynos 990 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
7. Samsung Exynos 2100Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
8. Apple M2Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) Apple M2 vs Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
9. Samsung Exynos 2100Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778GSamsung Exynos 2100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Samsung Exynos 2100


back to index