Samsung Exynos 2200 Benchmark, Test and specs

Last updated:
The Samsung Exynos 2200 has 8 cores with 8 threads and is based on the 6. gen of the Samsung Exynos series. The processor was released in Q1/2022. The Samsung Exynos 2200 scores 1,182 points in the Geekbench 5 single-core benchmark. In the Geekbench 5 multi-core benchmark, the result is 3,586 points.
Samsung Exynos 2200

At a glance

Name: Samsung Exynos 2200
Family: Samsung Exynos (49)
CPU group: Samsung Exynos 2200 (1)
Architecture: Cortex-X2/-A710/-A510
Technology: 4 nm
Segment: Smartphone / Tablet
Generation: 6
Predecessor: Samsung Exynos 2100
Successor: --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Samsung Exynos 2200 has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 2200 is 2.80 GHz. The number of CPU cores greatly affects the speed of the processor and is an important performance indicator.

CPU Cores / Threads: 8 / 8
Core architecture: hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
A-Core: 1x Cortex-X2
B-Core: 3x Cortex-A710
C-Core: 4x Cortex-A510
Hyperthreading / SMT: No
Overclocking: No
A-Core Frequency: 2.80 GHz
B-Core Frequency: 2.52 GHz
C-Core Frequency: 1.82 GHz

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

The Samsung Exynos 2200 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. Specifically, the Samsung Exynos 2200 uses the Samsung Xclipse 920, which has 384 texture shaders and 24 execution units. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

GPU name: Samsung Xclipse 920
GPU frequency: 1.30 GHz
GPU (Turbo): 1.30 GHz
Compute units: 24
Shader: 384
Hardware Raytracing: No
Release date: Q1/2022
Max. displays: 0
Generation: 1
Direct X: 12
Technology: 4 nm
Max. GPU Memory: 4 GB
Frame Generation: No

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

h265 / HEVC (8 bit): Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit): Decode / Encode
h264: Decode / Encode
VP8: No
VP9: Decode / Encode
AV1: Decode
AVC: No
VC-1: No
JPEG: No

Memory & PCIe

The processor can use up to 12 GB memory in 4 (Quad Channel) memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s. The memory type as well as the amount of memory can greatly affect the speed of the system.

Memory type: Memory bandwidth:
LPDDR5-6400
51.2 GB/s
Max. Memory: 12 GB
Memory channels: 4 (Quad Channel)
ECC: No
PCIe:
PCIe Bandwidth: --

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the processor is . The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. The TDP usually gives a rough idea of the actual power consumption of the CPU.

TDP (PL1 / PBP):
TDP (PL2): --
TDP up: --
TDP down: --
Tjunction max.: --

Technical details

The Samsung Exynos 2200 is made in 4 nm. The smaller the manufacturing process of a CPU, the more modern and energy-efficient it is. Overall, the processor has 0.00 MB cache. A large cache can greatly speed up the processor's speed in some cases such as games.

Technology: 4 nm
Chip design:
Socket: --
L2-Cache: --
L3-Cache: --
AES-NI: No
Operating systems: Android
Virtualization: None
Instruction set (ISA): Armv9-A (64 bit)
ISA extensions: --
Release date: Q1/2022
Release price: --
Part Number: SM-S908B
Documents: Technical data sheet

Rate this processor

Here you can rate this processor to help other visitors make their purchase decision. The average rating of this processor is 4.0 stars (76 ratings). Rate now:

Benchmark results

Verified Benchmark results
The benchmark results for the Samsung Exynos 2200 have been carefully checked by us. We only publish benchmark results that have been created by us or that have been submitted by a visitor and then checked by a team member. All results are based on and fullfill our benchmark guidelines.


Geekbench 6 Single-Core

Geekbench 6 is a partial load benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. In the single-core test, only the fastest CPU core is measured. The test run simulates the performance in practice.
MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ MediaTek Dimensity 9000+
8C 8T @ 3.20 GHz
1521
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
8C 8T @ 2.91 GHz
1496
Google Tensor Google Tensor
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1494
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1428
Google Tensor G2 Google Tensor G2
8C 8T @ 2.85 GHz
1426
Apple A12Z Bionic Apple A12Z Bionic
8C 8T @ 2.49 GHz
1351
Apple A12X Bionic Apple A12X Bionic
8C 8T @ 2.49 GHz
1341

Geekbench 6 Multi-Core

The practical Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark tests the system's performance under partial load. The processor's maximum power consumption is far from being used up.
Google Tensor Google Tensor
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
3639
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 MediaTek Dimensity 8020
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz
3631
Apple A13 Bionic Apple A13 Bionic
6C 6T @ 2.65 GHz
3599
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
3528
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 MediaTek Dimensity 8100
8C 8T @ 2.85 GHz
3521
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
8C 8T @ 3.00 GHz
3490
Samsung Exynos 1480 Samsung Exynos 1480
8C 8T @ 2.75 GHz
3472

Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
8C 8T @ 3.00 GHz
1229
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
8C 8T @ 3.20 GHz
1228
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
8C 8T @ 2.91 GHz
1220
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1182
Apple A12Z Bionic Apple A12Z Bionic
8C 8T @ 2.49 GHz
1124
Apple A12X Bionic Apple A12X Bionic
8C 8T @ 2.49 GHz
1124
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+
8C 8T @ 3.00 GHz
1123

Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 MediaTek Dimensity 8200
8C 8T @ 3.10 GHz
3699
Samsung Exynos 1580 Samsung Exynos 1580
8C 8T @ 0.70 GHzNot verified
3678
Google Tensor G3 Google Tensor G3
8C 8T @ 2.91 GHz
3631
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
3586
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+
8C 8T @ 3.00 GHz
3524
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 MediaTek Dimensity 8000
8C 8T @ 2.75 GHz
3460
Apple A13 Bionic Apple A13 Bionic
6C 6T @ 2.65 GHz
3429

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU) Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU)
Apple A15 (5 GPU Cores) @ 1.34 GHz
1713
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
Qualcomm Adreno 675 @ 0.59 GHz
1550
Apple A16 Bionic (5-CPU 4-GPU) Apple A16 Bionic (5-CPU 4-GPU)
Apple A16 (4 GPU Cores) @ 1.34 GHz
1431
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 1.30 GHz
1422
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+
Qualcomm Adreno 650 @ 0.67 GHz
1418
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
Qualcomm Adreno 650 @ 0.67 GHz
1418
Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU) Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)
Apple A15 (4 GPU Cores) @ 1.34 GHz
1370

AnTuTu 10 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 10 benchmark is one of the best-known benchmarks for mobile processors, which is now available in version 10. There is a version for Android-based smartphones and tablets, as well as a version for Apple mobile devices, i.e. iPhones and iPads.

The Antutu 10 benchmark has 3 phases. In the first phase, the device's RAM is tested, in phase 2 the graphics are tested and in the final phase the entire device is pushed to its performance limits by rendering 3D graphics.

Antutu 10 is therefore ideal for comparing the performance of different devices.
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 MediaTek Dimensity 8300
8C 8T @ 3.35 GHz
1468250
Apple A16 Bionic Apple A16 Bionic
6C 6T @ 3.46 GHz
1394590
Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU) Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU)
6C 6T @ 3.23 GHz
1157370
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1128320
Google Tensor G3 Google Tensor G3
8C 8T @ 2.91 GHz
1106280
Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU) Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)
6C 6T @ 3.23 GHz
1076520
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
8C 8T @ 2.63 GHz
769286

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
8C 8T @ 2.91 GHz
1010270
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
8C 8T @ 3.00 GHz
948574
Apple A16 Bionic Apple A16 Bionic
6C 6T @ 3.46 GHz
947502
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
917364
Google Tensor G3 Google Tensor G3
8C 8T @ 2.91 GHz
894587
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+
8C 8T @ 3.00 GHz
825450
Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU) Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU)
6C 6T @ 3.23 GHz
825116

Benchmarks


Description of the processor

The Samsung Exynos 2200 is an 8-core smartphone processor that Samsung first used in the Samsung Galaxy S22, the Galaxy S22 Plus and the Galaxy S22 Ultra in February 2022. Like all modern smartphone SoCs, Samsung uses a hybrid CPU core model here as well.

In the Samsung Exynos 2200, a prime core (Cortex-X2) calculates, which clocks at up to 2.8 GHz. This prime core is supported by three Cortex-A710 performance cores that clock at 2.52 GHz. Four Cortex-A510 are used as efficient CPU cores, which mainly take care of the calculation of background tasks and require little energy.

The biggest news in the Samsung Exynos 2200 is the integrated graphics used by Samsung. With the Samsung Xclipse 920, a graphics unit with AMDs RDNA 2 technology is used for the first time in a smartphone SoC. Depending on the benchmark, this is enough for a lead of 5 to 15 percent for the new graphics compared to the predecessor. An ARM Mali-G78 MP14 iGPU was also used in the Samsung Exynos 2100.

Compared to other modern smartphone SoCs, such as the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 or the Apple A15 Bionic, the new Samsung Xclipse 920 iGPU lacks the breath, the competition is sometimes 50 percent ahead of the new AMD solution in graphics benchmarks.

As expected, the CPU part of the Samsung Exynos 2200 is more on par with the competition. However, the performance does not match the performance of an Apple A14 from last year. Nevertheless, the Samsung Exynos 2200 is a premium SoC and handles all tasks that can arise on a smartphone without any problems.

The Samsung Exynos 2200 is manufactured using a modern 4 nm manufacturing process. The new and free video codec AV1 can decode the graphics unit in hardware. RAM is supported up to the LPDDR5-6400 type.



Popular comparisons

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Samsung Exynos 2200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
2. Samsung Exynos 2200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Samsung Exynos 2200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
4. Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 1380 Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
5. Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 990 Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 990
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Samsung Exynos 2200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
7. Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2100 Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
8. Google Tensor G3 Samsung Exynos 2200 Google Tensor G3 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
9. Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 9820 Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
10. Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU) Samsung Exynos 2200 Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU) vs Samsung Exynos 2200


back to index