Microsoft XBox Series S Benchmark, Test and specs
Last updated:
The Microsoft XBox Series S has 8 cores with 16 threads and is based on the 3. gen of the AMD Ryzen 7 series. The processor uses a mainboard with the BGA socket and was released in Q3/2020.
CPU lineageThe segment in which we have classified the Microsoft XBox Series S. Here you can see if it is a desktop processor or a mobile processor or which processor may be the successor of the Microsoft XBox Series S. |
|
| Name: | Microsoft XBox Series S |
| Family: | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| CPU group: | AMD Ryzen 4000G |
| Segment: | Desktop / Server |
| Generation: | 3 |
| Predecessor: | -- |
| Successor: | -- |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In addition to the number of CPU cores and threads, you can see here whether the Microsoft XBox Series S can be overclocked. You will also find the clock frequencies of the processor (single-core and multi-core) here. The number of CPU cores greatly affects the speed of the processor.
| CPU Cores / Threads: | 8 / 16 |
| Core architecture: | normal |
| Cores: | 8x Zen 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT: | Yes |
| Overclocking: | No |
| Frequency: | 3.00 GHz |
| Turbo Frequency (1 Core): | 3.60 GHz |
| Turbo Frequency (8 Cores): | 3.40 GHz |
Internal Graphics
The Microsoft XBox Series S has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. A processor with integrated graphics is also called APU (Accelerated Processing Unit).
| GPU name: | AMD Custom Radeon Graphics (XBox Series S) |
| GPU frequency: | 1.57 GHz |
| GPU (Turbo): | No turbo |
| Execution units: | 20 |
| Shader: | 1280 |
| Max. GPU Memory: | 8 GB |
| Max. displays: | 1 |
| Generation: | 1 |
| Direct X: | 12 |
| Technology: | 7 nm |
| Release date: | Q3/2021 |
Hardware codec support
A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit): | Decode / Encode |
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit): | Decode / Encode |
| h264: | Decode / Encode |
| VP8: | Decode / Encode |
| VP9: | Decode / Encode |
| AV1: | No |
| AVC: | Decode / Encode |
| VC-1: | Decode |
| JPEG: | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe memory type as well as the amount of memory can greatly affect the speed of the processor. The memory bandwidth depends on several factors and is given in gigabytes per second. |
|
| Memory type: | GDDR6 |
| Max. Memory: | 10 GB |
| Memory channels: | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| Bandwidth: | 224.0 GB/s |
| ECC: | No |
| PCIe: | 4.0 x 12 |
| AES-NI: | Yes |
Thermal ManagementThe Thermal Design Power (TDP for short) specifies the necessary cooling solution to cool the processor sufficiently. The TDP usually only gives a rough idea of the real consumption of a CPU. |
|
| TDP (PL1 / PBP): | 65 W |
| TDP (PL2): | -- |
| TDP up: | -- |
| TDP down: | -- |
| Tjunction max.: | 100 °C |
Technical details
Here you will find information on the size of the level 2 and level 3 cache of the Microsoft XBox Series S as well as a list of the processors ISA extensions. We have documented the architecture and the manufacturing technology for you as well as the release date.
| Technology: | 7 nm |
| Chip design: | Chiplet |
| Socket: | BGA |
| L2-Cache: | -- |
| L3-Cache: | 8.00 MB |
| Architecture: | Renoir (Zen 2) |
| Operating systems: | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
| Virtualization: | AMD-V, SVM |
| Instruction set (ISA): | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions: | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| Release date: | Q3/2020 |
| Release price: | -- |
| Part Number: | -- |
| Documents: | -- |
8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz (3.60 GHz)
buy now on Amazon and save!
Benchmark results
The benchmark results for the Microsoft XBox Series S have been carefully checked by us. We only publish benchmark results that have been created by us or that have been submitted by a visitor and then checked by a team member. All results are based on and fullfill our benchmark guidelines.
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Core i5-1035G4
4C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-1035G7
4C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core i7-6950X
10C 20T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
|
Microsoft XBox Series S
8C 16T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-10500
6C 12T @ 4.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-8259U
4C 8T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-1034G1
4C 8T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz |
||
|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
6C 12T @ 4.50 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8C 16T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Microsoft XBox Series S
8C 16T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
6C 12T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Sony Playstation 5
8C 16T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
|
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C 8T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
16C 32T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-8400
6C 6T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core i7-4790K
4C 8T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Microsoft XBox Series S
8C 16T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i7-5930K
6C 12T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core i3-10300T
4C 8T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-8600K
6C 6T @ 4.30 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
8C 16T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
8C 16T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
8C 16T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Microsoft XBox Series S
8C 16T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-11260H
6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
6C 12T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-11400H
6C 12T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon D-1735TR
8C 16T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
24C 48T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
32C 64T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Microsoft XBox Series S
8C 16T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i3-8300
4C 4T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
8C 8T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X
4C 4T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
Intel Core i5-10600K
6C 12T @ 4.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-10600KF
6C 12T @ 4.50 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
8C 16T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Microsoft XBox Series S
8C 16T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
6C 12T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i7-7800X
6C 12T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i3-12100
4C 8T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
AMD Radeon 780M Graphics @ 2.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU)
Apple M1 Pro (14 Core) @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
Apple M1 Pro (14 Core) @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Microsoft XBox Series S
AMD Custom Radeon Graphics (XBox Series S) @ 1.57 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
AMD Radeon RX 680M @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
AMD Radeon RX 680M @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
AMD Radeon RX 680M @ 2.40 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
Intel Xeon Gold 5117F
14C 28T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
8C 16T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
6C 12T @ 4.15 GHz |
||
|
|
Microsoft XBox Series S
8C 16T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 5118
12C 24T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
10C 20T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
10C 20T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (SC)
464 entries
464 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
439 entries
439 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
629 entries
629 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
576 entries
576 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
1,619 entries
1,619 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
1,606 entries
1,606 entries
FP32 SP iGPU
1,830 entries
1,830 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
1,409 entries
1,409 entries
Leaderboards
In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.
The best desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best AMD desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best Intel desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best mobile processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best smartphone processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best gaming CPU
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Fastest integrated graphics ever
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
CPU with the best price/performance ratio
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Leaderboards
show more results
show more results
Popular comparisons
