Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Celeron N5095

The Intel Celeron J4025 uses the 14 nm Gemini Lake architecture for entry-level desktops and embedded systems.

It offers two cores, two threads, 4 MB Level 3 Cache, and Intel UHD Graphics 600. With PCIe 2.0 and 38 GB/s memory bandwidth, it is designed for simple tasks like web browsing and basic office applications. The Intel Celeron N5095 is based on the 10 nm Jasper Lake architecture and is also intended for entry-level desktops, but delivers significantly more performance.

It integrates four cores, four threads, 2 MB Level 2 Cache, 4 MB Level 3 Cache, and Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Jasper Lake). Its PCIe 3.0 and 47 GB/s memory bandwidth enable noticeably higher responsiveness. In a performance comparison, the Intel Celeron N5095 offers significantly higher single-core and multi-core computing performance compared to the Intel Celeron J4025.

For gaming, both processors are only very limitedly usable. However, the graphics unit of the Intel Celeron N5095 offers marginally better performance for very simple or older game titles. Both CPUs are energy efficient. The Intel Celeron J4025 typically has a lower TDP.

Despite higher performance, the Intel Celeron N5095 remains energy efficient, but tends to have a higher TDP. In terms of price-performance ratio, the Intel Celeron N5095 often offers better value due to its more modern architecture and increased overall performance.