Intel Celeron 847 vs Intel Processor N100

The Intel Celeron 847 was introduced as a basic solution for budget notebooks and compact computers, while the Intel Processor N100 was designed for efficient micro-computers and mobile devices.

The Intel Celeron 847 is based on the Sandy Bridge U architecture and is manufactured using the 32-nanometer process with two cores and two threads. In contrast, the Intel Processor N100 uses the Alder Lake N architecture and the 10-nanometer process with four cores and four threads.

In benchmarks, the Intel Processor N100 shows significantly higher single-core and multi-core performance. This is also due to the advanced cache structure with 4 megabytes of L2 cache and 6 megabytes of L3 cache compared to the Intel Celeron 847, which has only 2 megabytes of L3 cache. In gaming scenarios, the Intel Processor N100 is superior, as its Intel UHD Graphics with 24 execution units offers more computing capacity than the Intel HD Graphics of the Intel Celeron 847.

Regarding energy efficiency, the Intel Processor N100 scores with a lower thermal design power and a higher memory bandwidth of 38 GB/s compared to 21 GB/s for the Intel Celeron 847. The price-performance ratio for office work is more favorable for the Intel Processor N100.

While the Intel Celeron 847 is sufficient for very simple tasks, the Intel Processor N100 is the recommendation for activities such as media playback. Its architecture allows for smoother operation with lower power consumption in passively cooled systems.