Intel Celeron J3455 vs Intel Processor N100

The Intel Celeron J3455 (Apollo Lake) was released in 2016 and is designed for energy-efficient, basic desktop systems.

It is manufactured using a 14nm process, features four cores, four threads, and 2 MB of Level 3 Cache. The integrated Intel HD Graphics 500 offers 30 GB/s maximum memory bandwidth and supports PCIe 2.0. The Intel Processor N100 (Alder Lake N) is a significantly newer processor for energy-efficient desktop systems.

Manufactured using a 10nm process, it also has four cores and four threads, based on the efficient Alder Lake N architecture, with 4 MB of Level 2 and 6 MB of Level 3 Cache. Its Intel UHD Graphics with 24 EUs and 38 GB/s memory bandwidth offers significantly better graphics performance, supports PCIe 3.0, and significantly surpasses the J3455 in single-core and multi-core performance.

With a TDP of 6 watts, the Intel Processor N100 is more energy-efficient than the Intel Celeron J3455 (10 watts), making it ideal for fanless systems. The price-performance ratio of the Intel Processor N100 is better due to its superior performance and efficiency, even if system costs might be higher.

Summary and Recommendation: The Intel Celeron J3455 is suitable for very simple, cost-optimized applications. For most modern use cases, the Intel Processor N100 is the better choice, as it offers significantly higher performance, better graphics performance, and superior energy efficiency.