AMD EPYC 9454 | Intel Celeron E1600 | |
CPU comparisonAMD EPYC 9454 or Intel Celeron E1600 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD EPYC 9454 has 48 cores with 96 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz. Up to 6144 GB of memory is supported in 12 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9454 was released in Q4/2022. The Intel Celeron E1600 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.40 GHz. The CPU supports up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron E1600 was released in Q2/2009. |
||
AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Intel Celeron (165) |
AMD EPYC 9004 (21) | CPU group | Intel Celeron E1000 (4) |
4 | Generation | 1 |
Genoa / Genoa-X (Zen 4) | Architecture | Conroe (Core) |
Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
-- | Predecessor | -- |
-- | Successor | -- |
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 9454 has 48 CPU cores and can calculate 96 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 9454 is 2.75 GHz (3.80 GHz) while the Intel Celeron E1600 has 2 CPU cores and 2 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Celeron E1600 is at 2.40 GHz. |
||
AMD EPYC 9454 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron E1600 |
48 | Cores | 2 |
96 | Threads | 2 |
normal | Core architecture | normal |
Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
No | Overclocking ? | No |
2.75 GHz | Frequency | 2.40 GHz |
3.80 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
3.65 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD EPYC 9454 can use up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 460.8 GB/s. The Intel Celeron E1600 supports up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 17.1 GB/s. |
||
AMD EPYC 9454 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron E1600 |
DDR5-4800 | Memory | DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 |
6144 GB | Max. Memory | 16 GB |
12 | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
460.8 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s |
Yes | ECC | No |
48.00 MB | L2 Cache | 0.50 MB |
256.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
5.0 | PCIe version | -- |
128 | PCIe lanes | -- |
504.1 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD EPYC 9454 is 290 W, while the Intel Celeron E1600 has a TDP of 65 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
AMD EPYC 9454 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron E1600 |
290 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 65 W |
-- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
300 W | TDP up | -- |
240 W | TDP down | -- |
100 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 9454 is manufactured in 5 nm and has 304.00 MB cache. The Intel Celeron E1600 is manufactured in 65 nm and has a 0.50 MB cache. |
||
AMD EPYC 9454 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron E1600 |
5 nm | Technology | 65 nm |
Chiplet | Chip design | Monolithic |
x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI | ISA extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 |
SP5 | Socket | LGA 775 |
AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | None |
Yes | AES-NI | No |
Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
Q4/2022 | Release date | Q2/2009 |
5225 $ | Release price | 58 $ |
show more data | show more data | |
AMD EPYC 9454
48C 96T @ 3.80 GHz |
|||
Intel Celeron E1600
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz |
AMD EPYC 9454
48C 96T @ 3.65 GHz |
|||
Intel Celeron E1600
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz |
AMD EPYC 9454
48C 96T @ 3.65 GHz |
|||
Intel Celeron E1600
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz |
Devices using this processor |
|
AMD EPYC 9454 | Intel Celeron E1600 |
Unknown | Unknown |