Intel Celeron E1600 vs Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Celeron E1600 | Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Celeron E1600 or Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Celeron E1600 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.40 GHz. Up to 16 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron E1600 was released in Q2/2009. The Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 was released in Q4/2007. |
||
| Intel Celeron (165) | Family | Intel Core2 Extreme (7) |
| Intel Celeron E1000 (4) | CPU group | Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9000 (3) |
| 1 | Generation | 2 |
| Conroe (Core) | Architecture | Yorkfield (Penryn) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Celeron E1600 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.40 GHz. The Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 has 4 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 3.00 GHz. |
||
| Intel Celeron E1600 | Characteristic | Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 2.40 GHz | Frequency | 3.00 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Celeron E1600 supports a maximum of 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 can connect up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Celeron E1600 | Characteristic | Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 |
| DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 | Memory | DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 |
| 16 GB | Max. Memory | 16 GB |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 17.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s |
| No | ECC | No |
| 0.50 MB | L2 Cache | 12.00 MB |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Celeron E1600 has a TDP of 65 W, that of the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 is 130 W. |
||
| Intel Celeron E1600 | Characteristic | Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 |
| 65 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 130 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Celeron E1600 has a 0.50 MB cache, while the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 cache has a total of 12.00 MB. |
||
| Intel Celeron E1600 | Characteristic | Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 |
| 65 nm | Technology | 45 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 | ISA extensions | MMX, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1 |
| LGA 775 | Socket | LGA 775 |
| None | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q2/2009 | Release date | Q4/2007 |
| 58 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 3.00 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Celeron E1600
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
4C 4T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Celeron E1600
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
4C 4T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Celeron E1600
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
4C 4T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
Intel Celeron E1600
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
4C 4T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Celeron E1600 | Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
