Intel Celeron G1620 Benchmark, Test and specs
Last updated:
The Intel Celeron G1620 has 2 cores with 2 threads and is based on the 3. gen of the Intel Celeron series. The processor uses a mainboard with the LGA 1155 socket and was released in Q1/2013. The Intel Celeron G1620 scores 512 points in the Geekbench 5 single-core benchmark. In the Geekbench 5 multi-core benchmark, the result is 951 points.
CPU lineageThe segment in which we have classified the Intel Celeron G1620. Here you can see if it is a desktop processor or a mobile processor or which processor may be the successor of the Intel Celeron G1620. |
|
| Name: | Intel Celeron G1620 |
| Family: | Intel Celeron |
| CPU group: | Intel Celeron G1000 |
| Segment: | Desktop / Server |
| Generation: | 3 |
| Predecessor: | -- |
| Successor: | -- |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
The Intel Celeron G1620 has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Celeron G1620 is 2.70 GHz. The number of CPU cores greatly affects the speed of the processor and is an important performance indicator.
| CPU Cores / Threads: | 2 / 2 |
| Core architecture: | normal |
| Cores: | 2x |
| Hyperthreading / SMT: | No |
| Overclocking: | No |
| Frequency: | 2.70 GHz |
| Turbo Frequency (1 Core): | -- |
| Turbo Frequency (2 Cores): | -- |
Internal Graphics
The Intel Celeron G1620 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. Specifically, the Intel Celeron G1620 uses the Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1), which has 48 texture shaders and 6 execution units. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.
| GPU name: | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) |
| GPU frequency: | 0.65 GHz |
| GPU (Turbo): | 1.05 GHz |
| Execution units: | 6 |
| Shader: | 48 |
| Max. GPU Memory: | 2 GB |
| Max. displays: | 3 |
| Generation: | 7 |
| Direct X: | 11.0 |
| Technology: | 22 nm |
| Release date: | Q4/2012 |
Hardware codec support
A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit): | No |
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit): | No |
| h264: | Decode / Encode |
| VP8: | No |
| VP9: | No |
| AV1: | No |
| AVC: | Decode / Encode |
| VC-1: | Decode |
| JPEG: | Decode |
Memory & PCIeThe processor can use up to memory in 2 (Dual Channel) memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The memory type as well as the amount of memory can greatly affect the speed of the system. |
|
| Memory type: | DDR3-1333 |
| Max. Memory: | |
| Memory channels: | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| Bandwidth: | -- |
| ECC: | No |
| PCIe: | 2.0 x 16 |
| AES-NI: | Yes |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the processor is 55 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. The TDP usually gives a rough idea of the actual power consumption of the CPU. |
|
| TDP (PL1 / PBP): | 55 W |
| TDP (PL2): | -- |
| TDP up: | -- |
| TDP down: | -- |
| Tjunction max.: | -- |
Technical details
The Intel Celeron G1620 is made in 22 nm. The smaller the manufacturing process of a CPU, the more modern and energy-efficient it is. Overall, the processor has 2.00 MB cache. A large cache can greatly speed up the processor's speed in some cases such as games.
| Technology: | 22 nm |
| Chip design: | Monolithic |
| Socket: | LGA 1155 |
| L2-Cache: | -- |
| L3-Cache: | 2.00 MB |
| Architecture: | Ivy Bridge S |
| Operating systems: | Windows 10, Linux |
| Virtualization: | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Instruction set (ISA): | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions: | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| Release date: | Q1/2013 |
| Release price: | 34 $ |
| Part Number: | -- |
| Documents: | -- |
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
buy now on Amazon and save!
Benchmark results
The benchmark results for the Intel Celeron G1620 have been carefully checked by us. We only publish benchmark results that have been created by us or that have been submitted by a visitor and then checked by a team member. All results are based on and fullfill our benchmark guidelines.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD FX-4170
4C 4T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-8300
8C 8T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core i7-920
4C 8T @ 2.93 GHz |
||
|
Intel Celeron G1620
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core2 Duo E8700
2C 2T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-8150
8C 8T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-4300
4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
Intel Core i3-4030U
2C 4T @ 1.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron J4025
2C 2T @ 2.90 GHz |
||
|
MediaTek Helio G37
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron G1620
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
AMD A8-5550M
4C 4T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 7420
8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz |
||
|
AMD Athlon II X3 440
3C 3T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.|
|
Intel Celeron G1610
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) @ 1.05 GHz |
||
|
Intel Pentium G2010
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) @ 1.05 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Pentium G2020
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) @ 1.05 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron G1620
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) @ 1.05 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Helio P70
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 @ 0.90 GHz |
||
|
UNISOC T616
ARM Mali-G57 MP1 @ 0.75 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Pentium 2117U
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) @ 1.00 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.|
|
Intel Celeron G1830
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A10-5745M
4C 4T @ 2.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron G1820
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron G1620
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i7-920
4C 8T @ 2.66 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A8-7100
4C 4T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A10-5700
4C 4T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.|
|
Intel Pentium G2010
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i3-2350M
2C 4T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core2 Duo E8500
2C 2T @ 3.16 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron G1620
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Pentium E5800
2C 2T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i3-2328M
2C 4T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i3-2330M
2C 4T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
AMD FX-8300
8C 8T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-8350
8C 8T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon E5-2628L v3
10C 20T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron G1620
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Pentium Silver J5040
4C 4T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron G1840T
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Pentium G2010
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
AMD Phenom II X3 700e
3C 3T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Pentium N4200
4C 4T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron J3455
4C 4T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron G1620
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron G1840T
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X2 521
2C 2T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core m3-8100Y
2C 4T @ 1.10 GHz |
||
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
Intel Celeron G1840T
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i3-7020U
2C 4T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Pentium 4405U
2C 4T @ 2.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron G1620
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-8310
8C 8T @ 4.30 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-8370E
8C 8T @ 4.30 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-8370
8C 8T @ 4.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
Intel Core i5-2467M
2C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X3 710
3C 3T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron 2970M
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron G1620
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
AMD Athlon 5350
4C 4T @ 2.05 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron J4005
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Pentium N3710
4C 4T @ 2.56 GHz |
||
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
AMD FX-4300
4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-8320
8C 8T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-4360U
2C 4T @ 2.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron G1620
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Athlon X4 845
4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core m3-6Y30
2C 4T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A8-7670K
4C 4T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
AMD A8-3520M
4C 4T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A10-4657M
4C 4T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Athlon II X2 370K
2C 2T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron G1620
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A6-5200
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A8-5550M
4C 4T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron N3450
4C 4T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.|
|
Intel Celeron N2807
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) @ 0.76 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron G1630
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) @ 1.05 GHz |
||
|
AMD E2-2000
AMD Radeon HD 7340 @ 0.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron G1620
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) @ 1.05 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron G1610
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) @ 1.05 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron G1610T
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) @ 1.05 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron G1620T
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) @ 1.05 GHz |
||
Benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (SC)
1,684 entries
1,684 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
1,671 entries
1,671 entries
FP32 SP iGPU
1,875 entries
1,875 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
1,453 entries
1,453 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
719 entries
719 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,102 entries
1,102 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,097 entries
1,097 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
942 entries
942 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
938 entries
938 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
824 entries
824 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
835 entries
835 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Leaderboards
In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.
The best desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best AMD desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best Intel desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best mobile processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best smartphone processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best gaming CPU
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Fastest integrated graphics ever
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
CPU with the best price/performance ratio
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Leaderboards
show more results
show more results
Popular comparisons
