Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Intel Core 7 processor 150UL
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96 (Alder Lake)
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Intel Core 7 processor 150UL |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Samsung Exynos (49) | Intel Core 7 (11) |
| CPU group | Samsung Exynos 9600 (3) | Intel Core processors - Desktop (Series 1) (10) |
| Architecture | Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 | Raptor Lake |
| Technology | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA 1700 | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Intel Core 7 processor 150UL |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 10 / 12 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 4x Cortex-A73 2.20 GHz |
2x Redwood Cove 5.00 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Cortex-A53 1.60 GHz |
8x Crestmont 3.70 GHz |
| L2-Cache | 12.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | ||
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Intel Core 7 processor 150UL |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | ARM Mali-G72 MP3 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96 (Alder Lake) |
| GPU frequency | 0.85 GHz | 0.35 - 1.30 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 3 / 48 | 96 / 768 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 1 | 4 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | 32 GB |
| Technology | 16 nm | 10 nm |
| Release date | Q3/2017 | Q1/2022 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Intel Core 7 processor 150UL |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Intel® AI Boost | |
| AI specifications | Intel Deep Learning Boost (Intel DL Boost) | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Intel Core 7 processor 150UL |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR4X-1600 | DDR5-5200 (83.2 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (51.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 96 GB | |
| Memory channels | 0 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 4.0 x 20 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 39.4 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Intel Core 7 processor 150UL |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | 55 W | |
| TDP up | 28 W | |
| TDP down | 12 W | |
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Intel Core 7 processor 150UL |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Android | Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | |
| Release date | Q2/2019 | Q2/2024 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Samsung Exynos 9609 is 5.0 stars (1 ratings), while Intel Core 7 processor 150UL has received 5.0 stars (2 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Intel Core 7 processor 150UL
10C / 12T · 0.00 GHz
2
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
3
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
4
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
5
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
6
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
8
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
9
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
8C / 16T · 4.60 GHz
Popular Comparisons
