Share link|

Submit benchmark

Comparison Search Benchmarks CPUs Leaderboards CPU News & Articles GPU comparison Apple product comparison

Deutsch English Español Français Italiano Japanese

Intel Processor N200 vs Qualcomm QCM6490

Last updated: 2026-06-07

Table of Contents

Summary
Benchmarks
Specifications
User Reviews
Popular Comparisons

Summary

Benchmarks

Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks

Single-core performance

Rank 1 - 100 %

Intel Processor N200

Rank 2 - 88 %

Qualcomm QCM6490

Multi-core performance

Rank 1 - 100 %

Intel Processor N200

Rank 1 - 100 %

Qualcomm QCM6490

Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance

4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz

1,288

8C / 8T · 2.71 GHz

1,097

Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance

4C / 4T · 3.40 GHz

3,504

8C / 8T · 2.71 GHz

2,745

Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance

4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz

958

8C / 8T · 2.71 GHz

869

Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance

4C / 4T · 3.40 GHz

2,128

8C / 8T · 2.71 GHz

2,705

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

Intel UHD Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake)

384

Qualcomm Adreno 643L

1,247

More benchmarks

Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries

Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries

Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries

Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries

Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries

Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries

Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries

Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries

FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries

3DMark Timespy (iGPU)
534 entries

AnTuTu 10 Benchmark
25 entries

PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries

Specifications

At a glance

Wischen	Intel Processor N200	Qualcomm QCM6490
Family	Intel Processor N (9)	Qualcomm Snapdragon (105)
CPU group	Intel Processor N50/N100/N200 (5)	Qualcomm QCM6490 (1)
Architecture	Alder Lake N	Kryo 670
Technology	10 nm	6 nm
Segment	Notebook	Smartphone / Tablet
Socket	BGA
Predecessor
Successor

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Wischen	Intel Processor N200	Qualcomm QCM6490
CPU Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 8
Hyperthreading / SMT	✗	✗
Core architecture	normal	hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
Core Cluster 1:	4x Gracemont 1.80 - 3.70 GHz	1x Cortex-A78 2.71 GHz
Core Cluster 2:		3x Cortex-A78 2.40 GHz
L2-Cache	4.00 MB
L3-Cache	6.00 MB
Overclocking	✗	✗

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Wischen	Intel Processor N200	Qualcomm QCM6490
GPU name	Intel UHD Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake)	Qualcomm Adreno 643L
GPU frequency	0.40 - 0.75 GHz	0.81 - 0.81 GHz
CUs / Shader	32 / 256	/ 768
Raytracing	✗	✗
Max. displays	3	1
Max. GPU Memory	8 GB
Technology	10 nm	6 nm
Release date	Q1/2023	Q4/2022

NPU AI performance

Wischen	Intel Processor N200	Qualcomm QCM6490
AI hardware		Qualcomm AI engine
AI specifications
NPU + CPU + iGPU

Memory & PCIe

Wischen	Intel Processor N200	Qualcomm QCM6490
Memory	LPDDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (25.6 GB/s)	LPDDR5-6400 (44.0 GB/s) LPDDR4X-4266 (34.1 GB/s)
Max. Memory	16 GB
Memory channels	1	2
ECC	No	No
PCIe	3.0 x 9
PCIe Bandwidth	8.9 GB/s

Thermal Management

Wischen	Intel Processor N200	Qualcomm QCM6490
TDP	6 W
TDP (PL2)
TDP up
TDP down
T. junction max.	105 °C

Technical details

Wischen	Intel Processor N200	Qualcomm QCM6490
Chip design	Monolithic	Chiplet
AES-NI	✓	✗
Operating systems	Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux	Android
Instruction set	x86-64 (64 bit)	Armv8-A (64 bit)
ISA extensions	SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2
Release date	Q1/2023	Q4/2021
Release price	193 $
Documents	Technical data sheet	Technical data sheet

User Reviews

Your rating

Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Processor N200 is 3.4 stars (105 ratings), while Qualcomm QCM6490 has received 4.4 stars (15 ratings).

Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.

Intel Processor N200
4C / 4T · 1.80 - 3.70 GHz

★★★★★

Qualcomm QCM6490
8C / 8T · 2.71 GHz

★★★★★