Share link|

Submit benchmark

Comparison Search Benchmarks CPUs Leaderboards CPU News & Articles GPU comparison Apple product comparison

Deutsch English Español Français Italiano Japanese

Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

Last updated: 2026-06-07

Table of Contents

Summary
Benchmarks
Specifications
User Reviews
Popular Comparisons

Summary

Benchmarks

Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks

Single-core performance

Rank 2 - 42 %

Intel Processor N200

Rank 1 - 100 %

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

Multi-core performance

Rank 2 - 15 %

Intel Processor N200

Rank 1 - 100 %

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance

4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz

1,288

16C / 16T · 5.10 GHz

2,971

Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance

4C / 4T · 3.40 GHz

3,504

16C / 16T · 2.10 GHz

17,133

Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance

4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz

958

16C / 16T · 5.10 GHz

2,356

Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance

4C / 4T · 3.40 GHz

2,128

16C / 16T · 2.10 GHz

18,758

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

Intel UHD Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake)

384

Intel Arc B390

7,680

More benchmarks

Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries

Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries

Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries

Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries

Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries

Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries

Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries

Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries

FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries

3DMark Timespy (iGPU)
534 entries

PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries

AI performance (NPU)
218 entries

Specifications

At a glance

Wischen	Intel Processor N200	Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Family	Intel Processor N (9)	Intel Core Ultra 9 (12)
CPU group	Intel Processor N50/N100/N200 (5)	Intel Core Ultra 300H (8)
Architecture	Alder Lake N	Panther Lake H
Technology	10 nm	2 nm
Segment	Notebook	Notebook
Socket	BGA	BGA 2540
Predecessor
Successor

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Wischen	Intel Processor N200	Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
CPU Cores / Threads	4 / 4	16 / 16
Hyperthreading / SMT	✗	✗
Core architecture	normal	hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Core Cluster 1:	4x Gracemont 1.80 - 3.70 GHz	4x Cougar Cove 2.10 - 5.10 GHz
Core Cluster 2:		8x Skymont 1.60 - 3.80 GHz
Core Cluster 3:		4x Crestmont 1.60 - 3.70 GHz
L2-Cache	4.00 MB	18.00 MB
L3-Cache	6.00 MB	24.00 MB
Overclocking	✗	✗

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Wischen	Intel Processor N200	Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
GPU name	Intel UHD Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake)	Intel Arc B390
GPU frequency	0.40 - 0.75 GHz	0.30 - 2.50 GHz
CUs / Shader	32 / 256	96 / 1536
Raytracing	✗	✓
Max. displays	3	4
Max. GPU Memory	8 GB	64 GB
Technology	10 nm	3 nm
Release date	Q1/2023	Q1/2026

NPU AI performance

Wischen	Intel Processor N200	Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
AI hardware		Intel® AI Boost
AI specifications		Intel NPU 5 @ 50 TOPS
NPU + CPU + iGPU

Memory & PCIe

Wischen	Intel Processor N200	Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Memory	LPDDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (25.6 GB/s)	LPDDR5X-9600 (153.6 GB/s)
Max. Memory	16 GB	96 GB
Memory channels	1	2
ECC	No	No
PCIe	3.0 x 9	5.0 x 12
PCIe Bandwidth	8.9 GB/s	47.3 GB/s

Thermal Management

Wischen	Intel Processor N200	Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
TDP	6 W	25 W
TDP (PL2)		80 W
TDP up
TDP down		15 W
T. junction max.	105 °C	100 °C

Technical details

Wischen	Intel Processor N200	Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Chip design	Monolithic	Chiplet
AES-NI	✓	✓
Operating systems	Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux	Windows 11, Linux
Instruction set	x86-64 (64 bit)	x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA extensions	SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2	SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
Release date	Q1/2023	Q1/2026
Release price	193 $
Documents	Technical data sheet	Technical data sheet

User Reviews

Your rating

Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Processor N200 is 3.4 stars (105 ratings), while Intel Core Ultra X9 388H has received 2.4 stars (65 ratings).

Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.

Intel Processor N200
4C / 4T · 1.80 - 3.70 GHz

★★★★★

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
16C / 16T · 2.10 - 5.10 GHz

★★★★★