Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Core Ultra 7 265U vs AMD EPYC 9275F
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265U | AMD EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Core Ultra 7 (31) | AMD EPYC (147) |
| CPU group | Intel Core Ultra 200U (4) | AMD EPYC 9005 (29) |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake U Refresh | Turin (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) |
| Technology | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Server |
| Socket | BGA 2049 | SP5 |
| Predecessor | Intel Core Ultra 7 165U | AMD EPYC 9274F |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265U | AMD EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 12 / 14 | 24 / 48 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | normal |
| Core Cluster 1: | 2x Redwood Cove 2.10 - 5.30 GHz |
24x Zen 5 4.00 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 8x Crestmont 1.70 - 4.20 GHz |
|
| Core Cluster 3: | 2x Crestmont 0.70 - 2.40 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 12.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 96.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265U | AMD EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel Iris Xe 4 Core Graphics 64 EUs (Meteor Lake) | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 0.60 - 2.10 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 64 / 512 | / |
| Raytracing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 4 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 32 GB | |
| Technology | 5 nm | |
| Release date | Q4/2023 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265U | AMD EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Intel® AI Boost | |
| AI specifications | Intel AI Boost @ 1.4 GHz (OpenVINO, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT) | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265U | AMD EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR5X-8400 (134.4 GB/s) DDR5-6400 (102.4 GB/s) | DDR5-6000 (480.0 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 128 GB | 6144 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 12 |
| ECC | No | Yes |
| PCIe | 4.0 x 20 | 5.0 x 128 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 39.4 GB/s | 504.1 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265U | AMD EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15 W | 320 W |
| TDP (PL2) | 57 W | |
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 12 W | |
| T. junction max. | 105 °C | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265U | AMD EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 11, Linux | Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI |
| Release date | Q1/2025 | Q4/2024 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Core Ultra 7 265U is 4.4 stars (8 ratings), while AMD EPYC 9275F has received 4.5 stars (2 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
AMD EPYC 9275F
24C / 48T · 0.00 GHz
9
Intel Core Ultra 7 265U
12C / 14T · 5.30 GHz
Popular Comparisons
