Intel Core i5-12400F vs Samsung Exynos 2200

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Core i5-12400F CPU1 vs CPU2 Samsung Exynos 2200
Intel Core i5-12400F Samsung Exynos 2200

CPU comparison

Intel Core i5-12400F or Samsung Exynos 2200 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Intel Core i5-12400F has 6 cores with 12 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.40 GHz. Up to 128 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Core i5-12400F was released in Q1/2022.

The Samsung Exynos 2200 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz. The CPU supports up to 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 2200 was released in Q1/2022.
Intel Core i5 (331) Family Samsung Exynos (47)
Intel Core i 12000 (34) CPU group Samsung Exynos 2200 (1)
12 Generation 6
Alder Lake S Architecture Cortex-X2/-A710/-A510
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
Intel Core i5-11400F Predecessor Samsung Exynos 2100
Intel Core i5-13400F Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a 6 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.50 GHz (4.40 GHz). The Samsung Exynos 2200 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.80 GHz.

Intel Core i5-12400F Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2200
6 Cores 8
12 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.50 GHz (4.40 GHz)
6x Golden Cove
A-Core 2.80 GHz
1x Cortex-X2
-- B-Core 2.52 GHz
3x Cortex-A710
-- C-Core 1.82 GHz
4x Cortex-A510

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Intel Core i5-12400F Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2200
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

no iGPU GPU Samsung Xclipse 920
GPU frequency 1.30 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 1.30 GHz
-- GPU Generation 1
Technology 4 nm
Max. displays 0
-- Compute units 24
-- Shader 384
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 4 GB
-- DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU Samsung Xclipse 920
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 Decode
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The Intel Core i5-12400F supports a maximum of 128 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 2200 can connect up to 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels.

Intel Core i5-12400F Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2200
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 Memory LPDDR5-6400
128 GB Max. Memory 12 GB
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 4 (Quad Channel)
76.8 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
No ECC No
7.50 MB L2 Cache --
18.00 MB L3 Cache --
5.0 PCIe version --
20 PCIe lanes --
78.8 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Core i5-12400F has a TDP of 65 W, that of the Samsung Exynos 2200 is --.

Intel Core i5-12400F Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2200
65 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
117 W TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
100 °C Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Core i5-12400F has a 25.50 MB cache, while the Samsung Exynos 2200 cache has a total of 0.00 MB.

Intel Core i5-12400F Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2200
10 nm Technology 4 nm
Monolithic Chip design Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv9-A (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+ ISA extensions --
LGA 1700 Socket --
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux Operating systems Android
Q1/2022 Release date Q1/2022
167 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Core i5-12400F to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.2 stars (63 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 2200 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.6 stars (25 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 (69%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 (40%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Core i5-12400F Intel Core i5-12400F
6C 12T @ 4.40 GHz
1647 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1182 (72%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Core i5-12400F Intel Core i5-12400F
6C 12T @ 4.00 GHz
9451 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
3586 (38%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Intel Core i5-12400F Intel Core i5-12400F
6C 12T @ 4.40 GHz
2197 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1428 (65%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Intel Core i5-12400F Intel Core i5-12400F
6C 12T @ 4.00 GHz
8668 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
3528 (41%)

Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)

The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
Intel Core i5-12400F Intel Core i5-12400F
6C 12T @ 4.40 GHz
102 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)

The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
Intel Core i5-12400F Intel Core i5-12400F
6C 12T @ 4.40 GHz
701 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Core i5-12400F Intel Core i5-12400F
6C 12T @ 4.40 GHz
1623 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Core i5-12400F Intel Core i5-12400F
6C 12T @ 4.00 GHz
12454 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Core i5-12400F Intel Core i5-12400F
6C 12T @ 4.40 GHz
664 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Core i5-12400F Intel Core i5-12400F
6C 12T @ 4.00 GHz
4784 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Core i5-12400F Intel Core i5-12400F
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 1.30 GHz
1422 (100%)

AnTuTu 10 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 10 benchmark is one of the best-known benchmarks for mobile processors, which is now available in version 10. There is a version for Android-based smartphones and tablets, as well as a version for Apple mobile devices, i.e. iPhones and iPads.

The Antutu 10 benchmark has 3 phases. In the first phase, the device's RAM is tested, in phase 2 the graphics are tested and in the final phase the entire device is pushed to its performance limits by rendering 3D graphics.

Antutu 10 is therefore ideal for comparing the performance of different devices.
Intel Core i5-12400F Intel Core i5-12400F
6C 12T @ 2.50 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1128320 (100%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
Intel Core i5-12400F Intel Core i5-12400F
6C 12T @ 2.50 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
917364 (100%)

Blender 3.1 Benchmark

In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
Intel Core i5-12400F Intel Core i5-12400F
6C 12T @ 4.00 GHz
170 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Core i5-12400F Intel Core i5-12400F
6C 12T @ 4.00 GHz
19559 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
Intel Core i5-12400F Intel Core i5-12400F
6C 12T @ 2.50 GHz
4772 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

CPU performance per watt (efficiency)

Efficiency of the processor under full load in the Cinebench R23 (multi-core) benchmark. The benchmark result is divided by the average energy required (CPU package power in watts). The higher the value, the more efficient the CPU is under full load.
Intel Core i5-12400F Intel Core i5-12400F
12,454 CB R23 MC @ 82 W
152 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Core i5-12400F Samsung Exynos 2200
Unknown Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Core i5-12400FAMD Ryzen 5 5600X Intel Core i5-12400F vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
2. Intel Core i5-13400FIntel Core i5-12400F Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i5-12400F
3. Intel Core i5-12400Intel Core i5-12400F Intel Core i5-12400 vs Intel Core i5-12400F
4. AMD Ryzen 5 5600Intel Core i5-12400F AMD Ryzen 5 5600 vs Intel Core i5-12400F
5. Intel Core i5-12400FAMD Ryzen 7 5700X Intel Core i5-12400F vs AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
6. Intel Core i5-12400FAMD Ryzen 5 5600G Intel Core i5-12400F vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
7. Intel Core i3-12100FIntel Core i5-12400F Intel Core i3-12100F vs Intel Core i5-12400F
8. Intel Core i5-12400FAMD Ryzen 5 5500 Intel Core i5-12400F vs AMD Ryzen 5 5500
9. Intel Core i5-12400FIntel Core i5-10400F Intel Core i5-12400F vs Intel Core i5-10400F
10. Intel Core i5-12400FIntel Core i5-11400F Intel Core i5-12400F vs Intel Core i5-11400F


back to index