Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron N5105 vs Intel Processor N200
Last updated:
Summary
The Intel Celeron N5105 (Jasper Lake architecture, 10 nm) is a quad-core processor with four threads. It is designed for cost-effective mini-PCs and thin clients that handle basic computing tasks.
The Intel Processor N200 (Alder Lake N architecture, 10 nm) is also a quad-core processor with four threads, aimed at energy-efficient entry-level systems with improved performance.
In performance tests, the Intel Processor N200 shows clearly superior computing performance, especially in Geekbench 6 and in multi-core tasks in Cinebench R23. The single-core performance in Cinebench R23 is comparable. Neither is suitable for gaming; the Intel Processor N200 offers better graphics performance with its Intel UHD Graphics (32 EUs) than the Intel Celeron N5105 (Intel UHD Graphics, 24 EUs).
The Intel Processor N200 is more energy-efficient than the Intel Celeron N5105 (10 watts) with a TDP of 6 watts, making it ideal for compact systems. Both CPUs are inexpensive. For a small additional cost, the Intel Processor N200 offers significantly more performance and efficiency, making it the more recommended choice for most everyday tasks.
The Intel Celeron N5105 remains an option for projects with minimal performance requirements and the strictest budget.
The Intel Processor N200 (Alder Lake N architecture, 10 nm) is also a quad-core processor with four threads, aimed at energy-efficient entry-level systems with improved performance.
In performance tests, the Intel Processor N200 shows clearly superior computing performance, especially in Geekbench 6 and in multi-core tasks in Cinebench R23. The single-core performance in Cinebench R23 is comparable. Neither is suitable for gaming; the Intel Processor N200 offers better graphics performance with its Intel UHD Graphics (32 EUs) than the Intel Celeron N5105 (Intel UHD Graphics, 24 EUs).
The Intel Processor N200 is more energy-efficient than the Intel Celeron N5105 (10 watts) with a TDP of 6 watts, making it ideal for compact systems. Both CPUs are inexpensive. For a small additional cost, the Intel Processor N200 offers significantly more performance and efficiency, making it the more recommended choice for most everyday tasks.
The Intel Celeron N5105 remains an option for projects with minimal performance requirements and the strictest budget.
Intel Celeron N5105
- Jasper Lake architecture
- Four cores, four threads
- Low price
- Basic performance for simple tasks
Intel Processor N200
- Alder Lake N architecture
- Four cores, four threads
- Better computing and graphics performance
- High energy efficiency (6W TDP)
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Cinebench R23 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron N5105
89 %
4C / 4T · 2.90 GHz
Intel Processor N200
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz
Cinebench R23 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron N5105
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.60 GHz
Intel Processor N200
67 %
4C / 4T · 3.40 GHz
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron N5105
38 %
4C / 4T · 2.90 GHz
Intel Processor N200
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron N5105
42 %
4C / 4T · 2.60 GHz
Intel Processor N200
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.40 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron N5105
70 %
4C / 4T · 2.90 GHz
Intel Processor N200
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron N5105
97 %
4C / 4T · 2.60 GHz
Intel Processor N200
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.40 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Celeron N5105
94 %
Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Jasper Lake)
Intel Processor N200
100 %
Intel UHD Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake)
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
3DMark Timespy (iGPU)
534 entries
534 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5105 | Intel Processor N200 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | Intel Processor N (9) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron N4000/N5000 (6) | Intel Processor N50/N100/N200 (5) |
| Architecture | Jasper Lake | Alder Lake N |
| Technology | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA 1338 | BGA |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5105 | Intel Processor N200 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 4x Tremont | 4x Gracemont |
| Frequency: | 2.00 GHz | 1.80 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.90 GHz | 3.70 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.60 GHz | 3.40 GHz |
| L2-Cache | 1.50 MB | 4.00 MB |
| L3-Cache | 4.00 MB | 6.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5105 | Intel Processor N200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Jasper Lake) | Intel UHD Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake) |
| GPU frequency | 0.45 - 0.90 GHz | 0.40 - 0.75 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 24 / 192 | 32 / 256 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Technology | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Release date | Q1/2021 | Q1/2023 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5105 | Intel Processor N200 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5105 | Intel Processor N200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-2933 (46.9 GB/s) | LPDDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 8 | 3.0 x 9 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 7.9 GB/s | 8.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5105 | Intel Processor N200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10 W | 6 W |
| TDP (PL2) | 20 W | |
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5105 | Intel Processor N200 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2 |
| Release date | Q1/2021 | Q1/2023 |
| Release price | 193 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron N5105 is 3.8 stars (85 ratings), while Intel Processor N200 has received 3.4 stars (105 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M4 (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 4.46 GHz
7
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
8
Intel Celeron N5105
4C / 4T · 2.90 GHz
9
Intel Processor N200
4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz
Popular Comparisons
