Intel Celeron N3050 vs Intel Celeron J4005

The Intel Celeron N3050 (Braswell, 2015) and the Intel Celeron J4005 (Gemini Lake, 2017) are energy-saving Intel processors, both manufactured using the 14 nm process and equipped with two cores/threads.

They are designed for entry-level desktops and embedded systems. The Intel Celeron N3050 offers 2 MB L3 cache, 26 GB/s memory bandwidth, and Intel HD Graphics 400. The Intel Celeron J4005 features 4 MB L3 cache, 38 GB/s memory bandwidth, and Intel UHD Graphics 600. According to internal benchmarks, the Intel Celeron J4005 significantly outperforms the Intel Celeron N3050 in single-core and multi-core performance, enabling smoother everyday operation.

For gaming, both Celerons are only very limitedly suitable; the Intel Celeron J4005 offers marginal advantages in simple titles or media playback due to its improved graphics unit and higher memory bandwidth. Both processors are known for low power consumption and are suitable for fanless systems.

An accurate price-performance evaluation is difficult without current market prices, but the Intel Celeron J4005 likely offers a better ratio due to its superior performance. The Intel Celeron N3050 is intended for basic tasks where maximum energy efficiency and lowest costs are a priority.

For noticeably more responsive use and better media playback, the Intel Celeron J4005 is clearly the better choice, as it delivers significantly higher computing and graphics performance with similar energy efficiency.