Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Atom C3758 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Atom C3758
25 %
8C / 8T · 2.20 GHz
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
100 %
8C / 8T · 3.05 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Atom C3758
62 %
8C / 8T · 2.20 GHz
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
100 %
8C / 8T · 3.05 GHz
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C3758 | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Atom (108) | Mediatek Dimensity (38) |
| CPU group | Intel Atom C3000 (20) | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 (2) |
| Architecture | Denverton | Cortex-X3 / -A715 / -A510 |
| Technology | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | BGA 1310 | |
| Predecessor | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ | |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C3758 | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 8x 2.20 GHz |
1x Cortex-X3 3.05 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 3x Cortex-A715 2.85 GHz |
|
| Core Cluster 3: | 4x Cortex-A510 1.80 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 16.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | ||
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C3758 | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11 |
| GPU frequency | 0.98 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | / | 11 / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | 4 nm | |
| Release date | Q4/2022 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C3758 | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C3758 | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) | LPDDR5X-8533 (68.3 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 16 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C3758 | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C3758 | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Android |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | Armv9-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | |
| Release date | Q3/2017 | Q4/2022 |
| Release price | 193 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Atom C3758 is 0 stars (0 ratings), while MediaTek Dimensity 9200 has received 4.1 stars (12 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
4
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
6
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
7
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
8C / 16T · 4.60 GHz
8
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
9
Intel Atom C3758
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
