Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
HiSilicon Kirin 920 vs Intel Processor N150
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
HiSilicon Kirin 920
15 %
ARM Mali-T628 MP4
Intel Processor N150
100 %
Intel Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake)
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 920 | Intel Processor N150 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | HiSilicon Kirin (29) | Intel Processor N (9) |
| CPU group | HiSilicon Kirin 920 (3) | Intel Processor N150/N250 (2) |
| Architecture | Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7 | Twin Lake |
| Technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA 1264 | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 920 | Intel Processor N150 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | normal |
| Core Cluster 1: | 4x Cortex-A15 1.70 GHz |
4x Gracemont 3.60 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Cortex-A7 1.30 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 4.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 6.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 920 | Intel Processor N150 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | ARM Mali-T628 MP4 | Intel Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake) |
| GPU frequency | 0.60 - 0.60 GHz | 0.00 - 1.00 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 4 / 64 | 32 / 256 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 1 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 16 GB | |
| Technology | 32nm | 10 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2012 | Q1/2020 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 920 | Intel Processor N150 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 920 | Intel Processor N150 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR3-1600 | DDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) LPDDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 9 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 8.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 920 | Intel Processor N150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | 25 W | |
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 920 | Intel Processor N150 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Android | Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | Armv7-A (32 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2 | |
| Release date | Q3/2014 | Q4/2024 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of HiSilicon Kirin 920 is 4.0 stars (3 ratings), while Intel Processor N150 has received 4.0 stars (299 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M4 (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 4.46 GHz
7
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
8
HiSilicon Kirin 920
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
9
Intel Processor N150
4C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
