Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Intel Processor N150
Last updated:
Summary
The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (Strix Halo, Zen 5, 4 nm) is a high-end processor for demanding tasks, AI, and powerful integrated graphics.
The Intel Processor N150 (Twin Lake, 7 nm) is for energy-efficient entry-level systems and basic tasks.
The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has 16 MB L2 and 64 MB L3 cache, PCIe 4.0, and 256 GB/s memory bandwidth. The Intel Processor N150 offers 4 MB L2 and 6 MB L3 cache, PCIe 3.0, and 38 GB/s memory bandwidth. The single and multi-core performance of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 significantly surpasses the Intel Processor N150.
For multi-core workloads, the AMD processor is superior. For gaming, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 with integrated AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics is better for a smoother gaming experience. The Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Alder Lake) of the Intel Processor N150 is only suitable for very light games.
The Intel Processor N150 is designed for maximum energy efficiency, ideal for economical systems. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 delivers more computing power, which requires higher energy consumption and more robust cooling. The price-performance ratio of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 targets the premium segment.
The Intel Processor N150 offers excellent value for money for budget-conscious entry-level buyers.
The Intel Processor N150 (Twin Lake, 7 nm) is for energy-efficient entry-level systems and basic tasks.
The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has 16 MB L2 and 64 MB L3 cache, PCIe 4.0, and 256 GB/s memory bandwidth. The Intel Processor N150 offers 4 MB L2 and 6 MB L3 cache, PCIe 3.0, and 38 GB/s memory bandwidth. The single and multi-core performance of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 significantly surpasses the Intel Processor N150.
For multi-core workloads, the AMD processor is superior. For gaming, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 with integrated AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics is better for a smoother gaming experience. The Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Alder Lake) of the Intel Processor N150 is only suitable for very light games.
The Intel Processor N150 is designed for maximum energy efficiency, ideal for economical systems. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 delivers more computing power, which requires higher energy consumption and more robust cooling. The price-performance ratio of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 targets the premium segment.
The Intel Processor N150 offers excellent value for money for budget-conscious entry-level buyers.
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
- High computing power (single- and multi-core)
- Powerful integrated graphics unit (AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics)
- AI capabilities
- Modern 4 nm manufacturing process
Intel Processor N150
- High energy efficiency
- Suitable for basic tasks
- Cost-effective in the entry-level segment
- For systems with low cooling requirements
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Cinebench 2024 Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
100 %
16C / 32T · 5.10 GHz
Intel Processor N150
53 %
4C / 4T · 3.60 GHz
Cinebench 2024 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
100 %
16C / 32T · 5.10 GHz
Intel Processor N150
10 %
4C / 4T · 3.60 GHz
Cinebench R23 Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
100 %
16C / 32T · 5.10 GHz
Intel Processor N150
45 %
4C / 4T · 3.60 GHz
Cinebench R23 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
100 %
16C / 32T · 3.00 GHz
4C / 4T · 3.60 GHz
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
100 %
16C / 32T · 5.10 GHz
Intel Processor N150
37 %
4C / 4T · 3.60 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
100 %
16C / 32T · 3.00 GHz
Intel Processor N150
12 %
4C / 4T · 3.60 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
100 %
AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics
Intel Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake)
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2026 (ST)
218 entries
218 entries
Cinebench 2026 (MC)
219 entries
219 entries
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
AI performance (NPU)
218 entries
218 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | Intel Processor N150 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD Ryzen AI Max (3) | Intel Processor N (9) |
| CPU group | AMD Ryzen AI MAX 300 (7) | Intel Processor N150/N250 (2) |
| Architecture | Strix Halo (Zen 5) | Twin Lake |
| Technology | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | FP11 | BGA 1264 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | Intel Processor N150 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 16x Zen 5 | 4x Gracemont |
| Frequency: | 3.00 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 5.10 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | ||
| L2-Cache | 16.00 MB | 4.00 MB |
| L3-Cache | 64.00 MB | 6.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | Intel Processor N150 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics | Intel Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake) |
| GPU frequency | 0.60 - 2.90 GHz | 0.00 - 1.00 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 40 / 2560 | 32 / 256 |
| Raytracing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 4 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 96 GB | 16 GB |
| Technology | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Release date | Q2/2025 | Q1/2020 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | Intel Processor N150 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | AMD Ryzen™ AI | |
| AI specifications | AMD Ryzen™ AI (XDNA 2) @ 50 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU | 126 TOPS |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | Intel Processor N150 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR5X-8000 (256.0 GB/s) | DDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) LPDDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 4.0 x 16 | 3.0 x 9 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 31.5 GB/s | 8.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | Intel Processor N150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55 W | 10 W |
| TDP (PL2) | 25 W | |
| TDP up | 120 W | |
| TDP down | 45 W | |
| T. junction max. | 100 °C | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | Intel Processor N150 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2,FMA3, AVX2, AVX512 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2 |
| Release date | Q2/2025 | Q4/2024 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is 4.0 stars (220 ratings), while Intel Processor N150 has received 4.0 stars (301 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Processor N150
4C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
9
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
16C / 32T · 5.10 GHz
Popular Comparisons
