Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) vs Samsung Exynos 2200

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) CPU1 vs CPU2 Samsung Exynos 2200
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) Samsung Exynos 2200

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) and the Samsung Exynos 2200 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) 24 core processor released in Q2/2023 with the Samsung Exynos 2200 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2022.
Apple M series (25) Family Samsung Exynos (47)
Apple M2 (8) CPU group Samsung Exynos 2200 (1)
2 Generation 6
M2 Architecture Cortex-X2/-A710/-A510
Mobile Segment Mobile
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) Predecessor Samsung Exynos 2100
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) is a 24 core processor with a clock frequency of 0.66 GHz (3.50 GHz). The processor can compute 24 threads at the same time. The Samsung Exynos 2200 clocks with 2.80 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel.

Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2200
24 Cores 8
24 Threads 8
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
0.66 GHz (3.50 GHz)
16x Avalanche
A-Core 2.80 GHz
1x Cortex-X2
0.60 GHz (2.42 GHz)
8x Blizzard
B-Core 2.52 GHz
3x Cortex-A710
-- C-Core 1.82 GHz
4x Cortex-A510

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2200
Apple Neural Engine AI hardware --
32 Neural cores @ 31.6 TOPS AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

Apple M2 Ultra (76 Core) GPU Samsung Xclipse 920
0.45 GHz GPU frequency 1.30 GHz
1.40 GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.30 GHz
2 GPU Generation 1
5 nm Technology 4 nm
8 Max. displays 0
1216 Compute units 24
9728 Shader 384
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
192 GB Max. GPU Memory 4 GB
-- DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Apple M2 Ultra (76 Core) GPU Samsung Xclipse 920
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 Decode
Decode Codec AVC No
Decode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

Up to 192 GB of memory in a maximum of 8 memory channels is supported by the Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU), while the Samsung Exynos 2200 supports a maximum of 12 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s enabled.

Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2200
LPDDR5-6400 Memory LPDDR5-6400
192 GB Max. Memory 12 GB
8 (Octa Channel) Memory channels 4 (Quad Channel)
819.1 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
No ECC No
72.00 MB L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache --
4.0 PCIe version --
64 PCIe lanes --
126.0 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) has a TDP of 80 W. The TDP of the Samsung Exynos 2200 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2200
80 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
100 °C Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) has 72.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 5 nm. The cache of Samsung Exynos 2200 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 4 nm.

Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2200
5 nm Technology 4 nm
Chiplet Chip design Unknown
Armv8.5-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv9-A (64 bit)
Rosetta 2 x86-Emulation ISA extensions --
-- Socket --
Apple Virtualization Framework Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
macOS, iPadOS Operating systems Android
Q2/2023 Release date Q1/2022
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.9 stars (131 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 2200 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.6 stars (25 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 (57%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 (15%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C 24T @ 3.50 GHz
1940 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1182 (61%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C 24T @ 3.50 GHz
27860 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
3586 (13%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C 24T @ 3.50 GHz
2689 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1428 (53%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C 24T @ 3.50 GHz
21450 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
3528 (16%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
Apple M2 Ultra (76 Core) @ 1.40 GHz
26980 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 1.30 GHz
1422 (5%)

Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)

The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C 24T @ 3.50 GHz
126 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)

The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C 24T @ 3.50 GHz
1918 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C 24T @ 3.50 GHz
1695 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C 24T @ 3.50 GHz
28570 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 10 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 10 benchmark is one of the best-known benchmarks for mobile processors, which is now available in version 10. There is a version for Android-based smartphones and tablets, as well as a version for Apple mobile devices, i.e. iPhones and iPads.

The Antutu 10 benchmark has 3 phases. In the first phase, the device's RAM is tested, in phase 2 the graphics are tested and in the final phase the entire device is pushed to its performance limits by rendering 3D graphics.

Antutu 10 is therefore ideal for comparing the performance of different devices.
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C 24T @ 0.66 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1128320 (100%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C 24T @ 0.66 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
917364 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C 24T @ 3.50 GHz
48560 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

CPU performance per watt (efficiency)

Efficiency of the processor under full load in the Cinebench R23 (multi-core) benchmark. The benchmark result is divided by the average energy required (CPU package power in watts). The higher the value, the more efficient the CPU is under full load.
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
28,570 CB R23 MC @ 80 W
357 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

AI performance (NPU)

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is given here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher.

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. The performance is given in the number (trillions) of arithmetic operations per second (TOPS).
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C 24T @ 0.66 GHz
31.6 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) Samsung Exynos 2200
Unknown Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Samsung Exynos 2200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
2. Samsung Exynos 2200Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888Samsung Exynos 2200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
4. Samsung Exynos 2200Samsung Exynos 990 Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 990
5. Samsung Exynos 2200Samsung Exynos 1380 Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
6. Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)AMD Ryzen 9 7950X Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 865Samsung Exynos 2200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
8. Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)Intel Core i9-13900KS Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) vs Intel Core i9-13900KS
9. Samsung Exynos 2200Samsung Exynos 9820 Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
10. Samsung Exynos 2200Samsung Exynos 2100 Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 2100


back to index