Apple A16 Bionic Google Tensor G2
VS

Apple A16 Bionic vs Google Tensor G2

Last updated:
The Apple A16 Bionic and the Google Tensor G2 were both released in 2022, with Apple serving the premium segment and Google serving its in-house Pixel series.

The Apple A16 Bionic is based on the A16 architecture, is manufactured using the modern 4-nanometer process, and has six cores. In contrast, the Google Tensor G2 uses the G2 architecture, is produced using the 5-nanometer process, and uses an eight-core structure. In benchmarks, the Apple A16 Bionic achieves significantly higher results in both single-core and multi-core performance compared to its ARM-based competitor.

In gaming scenarios, the Apple A16 Bionic with its integrated Apple A16 (5 GPU Cores) graphics offers more stable performance than the ARM Mali-G710 MP7 of the Google Tensor G2. Apple's architecture works more efficiently, leading to lower thermal stress in everyday use, while the Google Tensor G2 develops heat more quickly under high continuous load.

Although the memory bandwidth of the Google chip is slightly higher at 53 GB/s compared to Apple's 51 GB/s, the Apple A16 Bionic compensates for this with a massively larger total cache of 44 MB. The price-performance ratio is often more attractive for the Google Tensor G2, as the corresponding end devices are often offered at lower prices on the market.

The Apple A16 Bionic, on the other hand, offers a potentially longer useful life due to its high performance reserves. For users with a clear focus on maximum speed and efficiency, the Apple A16 Bionic is the better choice, while the Google Tensor G2 primarily convinces with its specialization in artificial intelligence and machine learning.

Apple A16 Bionic

  • Manufacturing in the modern 4-nanometer process
  • High single-core performance through optimized architecture
  • Large cache capacities of 20 MB L2 and 24 MB L3
  • Efficient Apple A16 (5 GPU Cores) graphics for mobile gaming

Google Tensor G2

  • Specialization in machine learning and AI functions
  • High memory bandwidth of 53 GB/s
  • ARM Mali-G710 MP7 graphics unit for smooth display
  • Better price-performance ratio of the end devices

Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks

Single-core performance
Rank 1 - 100 %
Apple A16 Bionic
Rank 2 - 56 %
Google Tensor G2
Multi-core performance
Rank 1 - 100 %
Apple A16 Bionic
Rank 2 - 55 %
Google Tensor G2
Geekbench 6 Single-Core

Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance

Apple A16 Bionic
6C / 6T · 3.46 GHz
2,531
Google Tensor G2
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz
1,426
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core

Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance

Apple A16 Bionic
6C / 6T · 3.46 GHz
6,299
Google Tensor G2
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz
3,342
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core

Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance

Apple A16 Bionic
6C / 6T · 3.46 GHz
1,890
Google Tensor G2
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz
1,068
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core

Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance

Apple A16 Bionic
6C / 6T · 3.46 GHz
5,465
Google Tensor G2
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz
3,149
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

Apple A16 Bionic
Apple A16 (5 GPU Cores)
1,789
Google Tensor G2
ARM Mali-G710 MP7
700
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
Multi-core performance

Apple A16 Bionic
6C / 6T · 3.46 GHz
947,502 pts
Google Tensor G2
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz
789,419 pts
AI performance (NPU)

AI performance (NPU)

Apple A16 Bionic
6C / 6T · 3.46 GHz
17.0 TOPS
Google Tensor G2
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz
4.0 TOPS

More benchmarks

At a glance

Wischen
Apple A16 BionicGoogle Tensor G2
FamilyApple A series (27)Google Tensor (5)
CPU groupApple A16 (2)Google Tensor G2 (1)
ArchitectureA16G2
Technology4 nm5 nm
SegmentSmartphone / TabletSmartphone / Tablet
Socket
PredecessorApple A15 Bionic (5-GPU)Google Tensor
SuccessorApple A17 Pro

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Wischen
Apple A16 BionicGoogle Tensor G2
CPU Cores / Threads6 / 68 / 8
Hyperthreading / SMT
Core architecturehybrid (big.LITTLE)hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
Core Cluster 1: 2x Everest
3.46 GHz
2x Cortex-X1
2.85 GHz
Core Cluster 2: 4x Sawtooth
2.02 GHz
2x Cortex-A78
2.35 GHz
Core Cluster 3: 4x Cortex-A55
1.80 GHz
L2-Cache20.00 MB8.00 MB
L3-Cache24.00 MB4.00 MB
Overclocking

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Wischen
Apple A16 BionicGoogle Tensor G2
GPU nameApple A16 (5 GPU Cores)ARM Mali-G710 MP7
GPU frequency0.40 - 1.34 GHz0.90 GHz
CUs / Shader20 / 6407 /
Raytracing
Max. displays31
Max. GPU Memory6 GB
Technology4 nm4 nm
Release dateQ3/2022Q2/2021

NPU AI performance

Wischen
Apple A16 BionicGoogle Tensor G2
AI hardwareApple Neural EngineGoogle Tensor AI
AI specifications16 Neural cores @ 17 TOPSGoogle Edge TPU @ 4 TOPS
NPU + CPU + iGPU

Memory & PCIe

Wischen
Apple A16 BionicGoogle Tensor G2
MemoryLPDDR5-6400 (51.2 GB/s)
LPDDR5-5500 (53.0 GB/s)
Max. Memory6 GB12 GB
Memory channels12
ECCNoNo
PCIe
PCIe Bandwidth

Thermal Management

Wischen
Apple A16 BionicGoogle Tensor G2
TDP10 W10 W
TDP (PL2)
TDP up
TDP down
T. junction max.

Technical details

Wischen
Apple A16 BionicGoogle Tensor G2
Chip designChipletChiplet
AES-NI
Operating systemsiOSAndroid
Instruction setArmv8.6-A (64 bit)Armv8-A (64 bit)
ISA extensions
Release dateQ3/2022Q4/2022
Release price
Documents

Your rating

Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Apple A16 Bionic is 4.1 stars (254 ratings), while Google Tensor G2 has received 4.0 stars (86 ratings).

Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.

Apple A16 Bionic
Apple A16 Bionic
6C / 6T · 3.46 GHz
Google Tensor G2
Google Tensor G2
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz

Most popular CPUs in both categories

Apple A16 Bionic
Apple A16 Bionic
Buy now on Amazon and save! Buy on Amazon