Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
AMD EPYC 9754 vs Intel Core i9-13900KS
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Intel Core i9-13900KS | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD EPYC 9754 and the Intel Core i9-13900KS and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the AMD EPYC 9754 128 core processor released in Q2/2023 with the Intel Core i9-13900KS which has 24 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2023. |
||
| AMD EPYC (145) | Family | Intel Core i9 (81) |
| AMD EPYC 8004/9004 (15) | CPU group | Intel Core i 13000 (18) |
| 4 | Generation | 13 |
| Bergamo/Siena (Zen 4c) | Architecture | Raptor Lake S |
| Server | Segment | Desktop |
| -- | Predecessor | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
| -- | Successor | Intel Core i9-14900KS |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 9754 is a 128 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.25 GHz (3.10 GHz). The processor can compute 256 threads at the same time. The Intel Core i9-13900KS clocks with 3.20 GHz (6.00 GHz), has 24 CPU cores and can calculate 32 threads in parallel. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Characteristic | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
| 128 | Cores | 24 |
| 256 | Threads | 32 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 2.25 GHz (3.10 GHz) 128x Zen 4c |
A-Core | 3.20 GHz (6.00 GHz) 8x Raptor Cove |
| -- | B-Core | 2.40 GHz (4.30 GHz) 16x Gracemont |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| GPU frequency | 0.30 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 1.65 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | 11 |
| Technology | 10 nm | |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| -- | Compute units | 32 |
| -- | Shader | 256 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 64 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | Decode |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeUp to 6144 GB of memory in a maximum of 12 memory channels is supported by the AMD EPYC 9754, while the Intel Core i9-13900KS supports a maximum of 192 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s enabled. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Characteristic | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
| DDR5-4800 | Memory | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 |
| 6144 GB | Max. Memory | 192 GB |
| 12 | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 460.8 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | 32.00 MB |
| 256.00 MB | L3 Cache | 36.00 MB |
| 5.0 | PCIe version | 5.0 |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | 20 |
| 504.1 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 78.8 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe AMD EPYC 9754 has a TDP of 360 W. The TDP of the Intel Core i9-13900KS is 150 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Characteristic | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
| 360 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 150 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | 253 W |
| 400 W | TDP up | 320 W |
| 320 W | TDP down | -- |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | 100 °C |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 9754 has 256.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 5 nm. The cache of Intel Core i9-13900KS is at 68.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 10 nm. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Characteristic | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
| 5 nm | Technology | 10 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+ |
| SP5 | Socket | LGA 1700 |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 | Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
| Q2/2023 | Release date | Q1/2023 |
| 11900 $ | Release price | 699 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
128C 256T @ 2.25 GHz (3.10 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
24C 32T @ 3.20 GHz (6.00 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core i9-13900KS
24C 32T @ 6.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900KS
24C 32T @ 5.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900KS
24C 32T @ 6.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)
The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900KS
24C 32T @ 6.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a partial load benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. In the single-core test, only the fastest CPU core is measured. The test run simulates the performance in practice.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900KS
24C 32T @ 6.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
The practical Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark tests the system's performance under partial load. The processor's maximum power consumption is far from being used up.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900KS
24C 32T @ 5.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900KS
24C 32T @ 6.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900KS
24C 32T @ 5.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900KS
24C 32T @ 6.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900KS
24C 32T @ 5.60 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900KS
Intel UHD Graphics 770 @ 1.65 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900KS
24C 32T @ 5.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900KS
24C 32T @ 6.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900KS
24C 32T @ 5.60 GHz |
||
CPU performance per watt (efficiency)
Efficiency of the processor under full load in the Cinebench R23 (multi-core) benchmark. The benchmark result is divided by the average energy required (CPU package power in watts). The higher the value, the more efficient the CPU is under full load.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
2.25 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900KS
40,837 CB R23 MC @ 257 W |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
| Unknown | Unknown |
News and articles for the AMD EPYC 9754 and the Intel Core i9-13900KS
Intel Microcode 0x129 Update increases the voltage and cpu temperature on my i5-13600K!
Posted by Stefan on 2024-09-09
I would like to share my experiences with the latest Intel microcode update (0x129) with you. After updating to the latest BIOS version of my mainboard, not only was the latest microcode active, but the BIOS now has an Intel Baseline Profile, which sets or limits certain voltage and power supply settings in the BIOS. I compare the results with the older microcode 0x104, which still can also be set in the new BIOS.
How to check if your Intel 13/14 gen cpu is affected by instability problems
Posted by Stefan on 2024-08-02
Maybe you have heard of problems with Intels Raptor Lake CPUs (13/14 Gen Intel Core i) that have degradation problems due to high voltage and therefore can crash in some situations like gaming. We show you an easy way to check if your cpu is affected by using Intels own Processor Diagnostic Tool.
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index