Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
AMD EPYC 9754 vs AMD EPYC 9654
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 9754 | AMD EPYC 9654 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD EPYC 9754 and the AMD EPYC 9654 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the AMD EPYC 9754 128 core processor released in Q2/2023 with the AMD EPYC 9654 which has 96 CPU cores and was introduced in Q4/2022. |
||
| AMD EPYC (145) | Family | AMD EPYC (145) |
| AMD EPYC 8004/9004 (15) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 9004 (21) |
| 4 | Generation | 4 |
| Bergamo/Siena (Zen 4c) | Architecture | Genoa / Genoa-X (Zen 4) |
| Server | Segment | Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 9754 is a 128 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.25 GHz (3.10 GHz). The processor can compute 256 threads at the same time. The AMD EPYC 9654 clocks with 2.40 GHz (3.70 GHz), has 96 CPU cores and can calculate 192 threads in parallel. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9654 |
| 128 | Cores | 96 |
| 256 | Threads | 192 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.25 GHz | Frequency | 2.40 GHz |
| 3.10 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.70 GHz |
| 3.10 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.55 GHz |
Memory & PCIeUp to 6144 GB of memory in a maximum of 12 memory channels is supported by the AMD EPYC 9754, while the AMD EPYC 9654 supports a maximum of 6144 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 460.8 GB/s enabled. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9654 |
| DDR5-4800 | Memory | DDR5-4800 |
| 6144 GB | Max. Memory | 6144 GB |
| 12 | Memory channels | 12 |
| 460.8 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | 96.00 MB |
| 256.00 MB | L3 Cache | 384.00 MB |
| 5.0 | PCIe version | 5.0 |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| 504.1 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 504.1 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe AMD EPYC 9754 has a TDP of 360 W. The TDP of the AMD EPYC 9654 is 360 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9654 |
| 360 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 360 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| 400 W | TDP up | 400 W |
| 320 W | TDP down | 320 W |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | 100 °C |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 9754 has 256.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 5 nm. The cache of AMD EPYC 9654 is at 480.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 5 nm. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9654 |
| 5 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI | ISA extensions | SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI |
| SP5 | Socket | SP5 |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 | Operating systems | Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 |
| Q2/2023 | Release date | Q4/2022 |
| 11900 $ | Release price | 11805 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
128C 256T @ 2.25 GHz (3.10 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
96C 192T @ 2.40 GHz (3.70 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9654
96C 192T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9654
96C 192T @ 3.55 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a partial load benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. In the single-core test, only the fastest CPU core is measured. The test run simulates the performance in practice.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9654
96C 192T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
The practical Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark tests the system's performance under partial load. The processor's maximum power consumption is far from being used up.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9654
96C 192T @ 3.55 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9654
96C 192T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9654
96C 192T @ 3.55 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9654
96C 192T @ 3.55 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 9754 | AMD EPYC 9654 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index