AMD EPYC 9754 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 9754 | HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD EPYC 9754 and the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the AMD EPYC 9754 128 core processor released in Q2/2023 with the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q2/2019. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | HiSilicon Kirin (29) |
| AMD EPYC 8004/9004 (15) | CPU group | HiSilicon Kirin 810/820 (3) |
| 4 | Generation | 6 |
| Bergamo/Siena (Zen 4c) | Architecture | Cortex-A76 / Cortex-A55 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 9754 is a 128 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.25 GHz (3.10 GHz). The processor can compute 256 threads at the same time. The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G clocks with 2.36 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G |
| 128 | Cores | 8 |
| 256 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.25 GHz (3.10 GHz) 128x Zen 4c |
A-Core | 2.36 GHz 4x Cortex-A76 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.84 GHz 4x Cortex-A55 |
Artificial Intelligence and Machine LearningProcessors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G |
| -- | AI hardware | HUAWEI HiAI 2.0 |
| -- | AI specifications | Da Vinci Architecture. Ascend D110 Lite |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G57 MP6 |
| GPU frequency | 0.85 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | Vallhall 1 |
| Technology | 7 nm | |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| -- | Compute units | 6 |
| -- | Shader | 96 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 4 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G57 MP6 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | Decode |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeUp to 6144 GB of memory in a maximum of 12 memory channels is supported by the AMD EPYC 9754, while the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G |
| DDR5-4800 | Memory | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| 6144 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 12 | Memory channels | 4 (Quad Channel) |
| 460.8 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 256.00 MB | L3 Cache | 2.00 MB |
| 5.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 504.1 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe AMD EPYC 9754 has a TDP of 360 W. The TDP of the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G is 6 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G |
| 360 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 6 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| 400 W | TDP up | -- |
| 320 W | TDP down | -- |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 9754 has 256.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 5 nm. The cache of HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G is at 2.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 7 nm. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G |
| 5 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI | ISA extensions | -- |
| SP5 | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 | Operating systems | Android |
| Q2/2023 | Release date | Q2/2019 |
| 11900 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
128C 256T @ 2.25 GHz (3.10 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.36 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
8C 8T @ 2.36 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
8C 8T @ 2.36 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
ARM Mali-G57 MP6 @ 0.85 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 2.25 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
8C 8T @ 2.36 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 9754 | HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G |
| Unknown | Huawei Honor 30S Huawei P40 Lite 5G |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
