AMD EPYC 7453 vs Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 7453 | Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU) | |
CPU comparisonAMD EPYC 7453 or Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU) - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD EPYC 7453 has 28 cores with 56 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.45 GHz. Up to 4096 GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7453 was released in Q1/2021. The Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU) has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to 32 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU) was released in Q3/2021. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Apple M series (25) |
| AMD EPYC 7003 (29) | CPU group | Apple M1 (9) |
| 3 | Generation | 1 |
| Milan (Zen 3) | Architecture | M1 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| AMD EPYC 7452 | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 7453 has 28 CPU cores and can calculate 56 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7453 is 2.75 GHz (3.45 GHz) while the Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU) has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU) is at 0.60 GHz (3.20 GHz). |
||
| AMD EPYC 7453 | Characteristic | Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU) |
| 28 | Cores | 8 |
| 56 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.75 GHz (3.45 GHz) 28x Zen 3 |
A-Core | 0.60 GHz (3.20 GHz) 6x Firestorm |
| -- | B-Core | 0.60 GHz (2.06 GHz) 2x Icestorm |
NPU AI performanceThe performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7453 | Characteristic | Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU) |
| -- | AI hardware | Apple Neural Engine |
| -- | AI specifications | 16 Neural cores @ 11 TOPS |
| -- | NPU + CPU + iGPU | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The AMD EPYC 7453 or Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU) has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | Apple M1 Pro (14 Core) |
| GPU frequency | 0.39 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 1.30 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | 1 |
| Technology | 5 nm | |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| -- | Compute units | 224 |
| -- | Shader | 1792 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 32 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | Apple M1 Pro (14 Core) |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD EPYC 7453 can use up to 4096 GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 204.8 GB/s. The Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU) supports up to 32 GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 102.4 GB/s. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7453 | Characteristic | Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU) |
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | LPDDR5-6400 |
| 4096 GB | Max. Memory | 32 GB |
| 8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 204.8 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | 24.00 MB |
| 64.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | 4.0 |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 252.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD EPYC 7453 is 225 W, while the Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU) has a TDP of 35 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7453 | Characteristic | Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU) |
| 225 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 35 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| 240 W | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 7453 is manufactured in 7 nm and has 64.00 MB cache. The Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU) is manufactured in 5 nm and has a 24.00 MB cache. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7453 | Characteristic | Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU) |
| 7 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8.5-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | Rosetta 2 x86-Emulation |
| SP3 | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | Apple Virtualization Framework |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | macOS |
| Q1/2021 | Release date | Q3/2021 |
| 1570 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
28C 56T @ 2.75 GHz (3.45 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 0.60 GHz (3.20 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD EPYC 7453
28C 56T @ 3.45 GHz |
||
|
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C 8T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7453
28C 56T @ 3.45 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C 8T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7453
28C 56T @ 3.25 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C 8T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7453
28C 56T @ 3.45 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C 8T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7453
28C 56T @ 3.25 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C 8T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7453
28C 56T @ 3.45 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C 8T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)
The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7453
28C 56T @ 3.45 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C 8T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7453
28C 56T @ 3.25 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C 8T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7453
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
Apple M1 Pro (14 Core) @ 1.30 GHz |
||
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7453
28C 56T @ 3.25 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C 8T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7453
28C 56T @ 3.25 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C 8T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
CPU performance per watt (efficiency)
Efficiency of the processor under full load in the Cinebench R23 (multi-core) benchmark. The benchmark result is divided by the average energy required (CPU package power in watts). The higher the value, the more efficient the CPU is under full load.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7453
2.75 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
9,569 CB R23 MC @ 35 W |
||
AI performance (NPU)
The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is given here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher.
Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. The performance is given in the number (trillions) of arithmetic operations per second (TOPS).
Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. The performance is given in the number (trillions) of arithmetic operations per second (TOPS).
|
|
AMD EPYC 7453
28C 56T @ 2.75 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C 8T @ 0.60 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 7453 | Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU) |
| Unknown | Apple MacBook Pro 14 (2021) Apple MacBook Pro 16 (2021) |
News and articles for the AMD EPYC 7453 and the Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
Apple M2 Pro with more CPU cores and production in 3 nm ?
Posted by Stefan on 2022-06-28
After Apple surprisingly presented the normal Apple M2 processor as the first successor to the Apple M1 already in June 2022, the Apple M2 Pro and the Apple M2 Max may follow in autumn. The difference in performance compared to the basic version could be even greater this time and range from 25 to 40 percent.
In this article we describe how Apple could realize this and why the price should also go up.
In this article we describe how Apple could realize this and why the price should also go up.
Apple M2 vs Apple M1 - What are the differences?
Posted by Stefan on 2022-06-09
During WWDC 2022 on June 6th, 2022 Apple surprisingly presented its new Apple M2 processor. This will initially be installed in a completely revised Apple MacBook Air with 13.6 inches, a even thinner form factor and new colors. Apple also updated the already known (old) Apple MacBook Pro 13.3 with touch bar.
Many leakers had counted on Apple not presenting its new second-generation M processor until the fall. But things turned out differently. And there is very likely a reason for that: the improvements in the Apple M2 are limited compared to the predecessor.
Many leakers had counted on Apple not presenting its new second-generation M processor until the fall. But things turned out differently. And there is very likely a reason for that: the improvements in the Apple M2 are limited compared to the predecessor.
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
