AMD EPYC 7452 Benchmark, Test and specs
Last updated:
The AMD EPYC 7452 has 32 cores with 64 threads and is based on the 2. gen of the AMD EPYC series. The processor uses a mainboard with the SP3 socket and was released in Q3/2019. The AMD EPYC 7452 scores 968 points in the Geekbench 5 single-core benchmark. In the Geekbench 5 multi-core benchmark, the result is 26,314 points.
CPU lineageThe segment in which we have classified the AMD EPYC 7452. Here you can see if it is a desktop processor or a mobile processor or which processor may be the successor of the AMD EPYC 7452. |
|
| Name: | AMD EPYC 7452 |
| Family: | AMD EPYC |
| CPU group: | AMD EPYC 7002 |
| Segment: | Desktop / Server |
| Generation: | 2 |
| Predecessor: | -- |
| Successor: | AMD EPYC 7453 |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
The AMD EPYC 7452 has 32 CPU cores and can calculate 64 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7452 is 2.35 GHz (3.35 GHz). The number of CPU cores greatly affects the speed of the processor and is an important performance indicator.
| CPU Cores / Threads: | 32 / 64 |
| Core architecture: | normal |
| Cores: | 32x |
| Hyperthreading / SMT: | Yes |
| Overclocking: | No |
| Frequency: | 2.35 GHz |
| Turbo Frequency (1 Core): | 3.35 GHz |
| Turbo Frequency (32 Cores): | 2.65 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe processor can use up to memory in 8 (Octa Channel) memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 204.8 GB/s. The memory type as well as the amount of memory can greatly affect the speed of the system. |
|
| Memory type: | DDR4-3200 |
| Max. Memory: | |
| Memory channels: | 8 (Octa Channel) |
| Bandwidth: | 204.8 GB/s |
| ECC: | Yes |
| PCIe: | 4.0 x 128 |
| AES-NI: | Yes |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the processor is 155 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. The TDP usually gives a rough idea of the actual power consumption of the CPU. |
|
| TDP (PL1 / PBP): | 155 W |
| TDP (PL2): | -- |
| TDP up: | -- |
| TDP down: | -- |
| Tjunction max.: | -- |
Technical details
The AMD EPYC 7452 is made in 7 nm. The smaller the manufacturing process of a CPU, the more modern and energy-efficient it is. Overall, the processor has 128.00 MB cache. A large cache can greatly speed up the processor's speed in some cases such as games.
| Technology: | 7 nm |
| Chip design: | Chiplet |
| Socket: | SP3 |
| L2-Cache: | -- |
| L3-Cache: | 128.00 MB |
| Architecture: | Rome (Zen 2) |
| Operating systems: | Windows 10, Linux |
| Virtualization: | AMD-V, SVM |
| Instruction set (ISA): | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions: | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| Release date: | Q3/2019 |
| Release price: | 3250 $ |
| Part Number: | -- |
| Documents: | Technical data sheet |
32C 64T @ 2.35 GHz (3.35 GHz)
buy now on Amazon and save!
Benchmark results
The benchmark results for the AMD EPYC 7452 have been carefully checked by us. We only publish benchmark results that have been created by us or that have been submitted by a visitor and then checked by a team member. All results are based on and fullfill our benchmark guidelines.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon W-3223
8C 16T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core i5-6600K
4C 4T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
|
Intel Pentium Gold G6400E
2C 4T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 7452
32C 64T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
4C 8T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7402P
24C 48T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7402
24C 48T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.|
|
Intel Core i5-4590
4C 4T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
8C 16T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
MediaTek Dimensity 1300
8C 8T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7452
32C 64T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-7500T
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-6400
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core i7-5930K
6C 12T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
Intel Core i9-12900E
16C 24T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-2295
18C 36T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7532
32C 64T @ 2.90 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7452
32C 64T @ 2.65 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7502
32C 64T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
6C 12T @ 5.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900H
14C 20T @ 5.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Core i3-8100
4C 4T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Pentium G4620
2C 4T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4
16C 32T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7452
32C 64T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-10400T
6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-6600
4C 4T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-9500TE
6C 6T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
32C 64T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7542
32C 64T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7502
32C 64T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7452
32C 64T @ 2.65 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7443
24C 48T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8358
32C 64T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y
32C 64T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.|
|
AMD EPYC 7313P
16C 32T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core i7-13700
16C 24T @ 5.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i7-13700F
16C 24T @ 5.10 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7452
32C 64T @ 2.65 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6354
18C 36T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7352
24C 48T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-12900KF
16C 24T @ 5.00 GHz |
||
Benchmarks
Cinebench R20 (SC)
633 entries
633 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,597 entries
1,597 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,546 entries
1,546 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,357 entries
2,357 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,330 entries
2,330 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,290 entries
2,290 entries
Leaderboards
In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.
The best desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best AMD desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best Intel desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best mobile processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best smartphone processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best gaming CPU
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Fastest integrated graphics ever
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
CPU with the best price/performance ratio
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Leaderboards
show more results
show more results
Popular comparisons
