Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs AMD E-240
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
100 %
Qualcomm Adreno 620
AMD E-240
16 %
AMD Radeon HD 6310
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
118 entries
118 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
AI performance (NPU)
218 entries
218 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 | AMD E-240 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Qualcomm Snapdragon (105) | AMD E (23) |
| CPU group | Qualcomm Snapdragon 760 (3) | AMD E/E1/E2-1000 (5) |
| Architecture | Kryo 475 | Zacate (Bobcat) |
| Technology | 7 nm | 32 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA 413 | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 | AMD E-240 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 1 / 1 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | normal |
| Core Cluster 1: | 1x Kryo 475 Prime 2.30 GHz |
1x 1.50 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 1x Kryo 475 Gold 2.20 GHz |
|
| Core Cluster 3: | 6x Kryo 475 Silver 1.80 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 2.00 MB | 1.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 | AMD E-240 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Qualcomm Adreno 620 | AMD Radeon HD 6310 |
| GPU frequency | 0.63 GHz | 0.49 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | / 192 | 1 / 80 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | 2 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Technology | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Release date | Q2/2019 | Q4/2010 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 | AMD E-240 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Qualcomm AI engine | |
| AI specifications | Hexagon 696 @ 5.5 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 | AMD E-240 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR4-3733 (14.9 GB/s) | DDR3-1066 (8.5 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 12 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 | AMD E-240 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 5 W | 18 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 | AMD E-240 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Unknown |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Android | |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX | |
| Release date | Q3/2020 | Q1/2011 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 is 5.0 stars (2 ratings), while AMD E-240 has received 2.3 stars (6 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
10C / 10T · 3.20 GHz
9
AMD E-240
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
