Intel Xeon W-3275 vs Samsung Exynos 4212
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon W-3275 | Samsung Exynos 4212 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon W-3275 or Samsung Exynos 4212 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon W-3275 has 28 cores with 56 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.60 GHz. Up to 1024 GB of memory is supported in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon W-3275 was released in Q2/2019. The Samsung Exynos 4212 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.50 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 4212 was released in Q3/2011. |
||
| Intel Xeon W (83) | Family | Samsung Exynos (46) |
| Intel Xeon W-2200/3200 (17) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 4212 (1) |
| 7 | Generation | 2 |
| Cascade Lake W | Architecture | Cortex-A9 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| Intel Xeon W-3175X | Predecessor | -- |
| Intel Xeon W-3375 | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon W-3275 has 28 CPU cores and can calculate 56 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon W-3275 is 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz) while the Samsung Exynos 4212 has 2 CPU cores and 2 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 4212 is at 1.50 GHz. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3275 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 4212 |
| 28 | Cores | 2 |
| 56 | Threads | 2 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.50 GHz | Frequency | 1.50 GHz |
| 4.60 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 3.40 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Internal GraphicsThe Intel Xeon W-3275 or Samsung Exynos 4212 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 |
| GPU frequency | 0.40 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.40 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Utgard |
| Technology | 28nm | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| -- | Compute units | 4 |
| -- | Shader | 64 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 0 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon W-3275 can use up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 140.7 GB/s. The Samsung Exynos 4212 supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3275 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 4212 |
| DDR4-2933 | Memory | LPDDR2-400 |
| 1024 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 6 (Hexa Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 140.7 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | 1.00 MB |
| 38.50 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 64 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 63.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Xeon W-3275 is 205 W, while the Samsung Exynos 4212 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3275 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 4212 |
| 205 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon W-3275 is manufactured in 14 nm and has 38.50 MB cache. The Samsung Exynos 4212 is manufactured in 32 nm and has a 1.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3275 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 4212 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | ISA extensions | -- |
| LGA 3647 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q2/2019 | Release date | Q3/2011 |
| 4250 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
28C 56T @ 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 4212
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 4212
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 4212
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 4212
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 4212
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 4212
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 4212
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 4212
ARM Mali-400 MP4 @ 0.40 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 4212
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon W-3275 | Samsung Exynos 4212 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
