AMD EPYC 7F72 vs Intel Xeon W-3275

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD EPYC 7F72 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Xeon W-3275
AMD EPYC 7F72 Intel Xeon W-3275

CPU comparison

AMD EPYC 7F72 or Intel Xeon W-3275 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The AMD EPYC 7F72 has 24 cores with 48 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7F72 was released in Q2/2020.

The Intel Xeon W-3275 has 28 cores with 56 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.60 GHz. The CPU supports up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon W-3275 was released in Q2/2019.
AMD EPYC Family Intel Xeon W
AMD EPYC 7002 CPU group Intel Xeon W-2200/3200
2 Generation 7
Rome (Zen 2) Architecture Cascade Lake W
Desktop / Server Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor Intel Xeon W-3175X
-- Successor Intel Xeon W-3375

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD EPYC 7F72 has 24 CPU cores and can calculate 48 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7F72 is 3.20 GHz (3.70 GHz) while the Intel Xeon W-3275 has 28 CPU cores and 56 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon W-3275 is at --.

24 Cores 28
48 Threads 56
normal Core architecture normal
Yes Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
3.20 GHz Frequency 2.50 GHz
3.70 GHz Turbo Frequency (1 Core) 4.60 GHz
3.50 GHz Turbo Frequency (All Cores) 3.40 GHz

Internal Graphics

The AMD EPYC 7F72 or Intel Xeon W-3275 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

no iGPU GPU no iGPU
GPU frequency
GPU (Turbo)
GPU Generation
Technology
Max. displays
Execution units
Shader
Max. GPU Memory
DirectX Version

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
No Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The AMD EPYC 7F72 can use up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The Intel Xeon W-3275 supports up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --.

DDR4-3200 Memory DDR4-2933
Max. Memory 1024 GB
8 (Octa Channel) Memory channels 6 (Hexa Channel)
-- Bandwidth --
Yes ECC Yes
L2 Cache
192.00 MB L3 Cache 38.50 MB
4.0 PCIe version 3.0
128 PCIe lanes 64

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD EPYC 7F72 is 240 W, while the Intel Xeon W-3275 has a TDP of 205 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

240 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 205 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD EPYC 7F72 is manufactured in 7 nm and has 192.00 MB cache. The Intel Xeon W-3275 is manufactured in 14 nm and has a 192.00 MB cache.

7 nm Technology 14 nm
Chiplet Chip design Monolithic
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
SP3 Socket LGA 3647
AMD-V, SVM Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Yes AES-NI Yes
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q2/2020 Release date Q2/2019
2450 $ Release price 4250 $
show more data show more data



Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

AMD EPYC 7F72 AMD EPYC 7F72
24C 48T @ 3.70 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz
1107 (100%)
Show all Cinebench R23 (Single-Core) results



Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

AMD EPYC 7F72 AMD EPYC 7F72
24C 48T @ 3.50 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz
28051 (100%)
Show all Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core) results



Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

AMD EPYC 7F72 AMD EPYC 7F72
24C 48T @ 3.70 GHz
425 (97%)
Intel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz
437 (100%)
Show all Cinebench R20 (Single-Core) results



Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

AMD EPYC 7F72 AMD EPYC 7F72
24C 48T @ 3.50 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz
11020 (100%)
Show all Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core) results



Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

AMD EPYC 7F72 AMD EPYC 7F72
24C 48T @ 3.70 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz
1096 (100%)
Show all Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core) results



Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

AMD EPYC 7F72 AMD EPYC 7F72
24C 48T @ 3.50 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz
17196 (100%)
Show all Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core) results



Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

AMD EPYC 7F72 AMD EPYC 7F72
24C 48T @ 3.50 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz
36622 (100%)
Show all Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark results



V-Ray CPU-Render Benchmark

V-Ray is a 3D rendering software from the manufacturer Chaos for designers and artists. Unlike many other render engines, V-Ray is capable of so-called hybrid rendering, in which the CPU and GPU work together at the same time.

However, the CPU benchmark we used (CPU Render Mode) only uses the system's processor. The working memory used plays a major role in the V-Ray benchmark. For our benchmarks we use the fastest RAM standard approved by the manufacturer (without overclocking).

Due to the high compatibility of V-Ray (including Autodesk 3ds Max, Maya, Cinema 4D, SketchUp, Unreal Engine and Blender), it is a frequently used software. With V-Ray, for example, photorealistic images can be rendered that laypeople cannot distinguish from normal photos.

AMD EPYC 7F72 AMD EPYC 7F72
24C 48T @ 3.20 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 2.50 GHz
24755 (100%)
Show all V-Ray CPU-Render Benchmark results



Devices using this processor

AMD EPYC 7F72 Intel Xeon W-3275
Unknown Unknown

Leaderboards

In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.


Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990XIntel Xeon W-3275 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Intel Xeon W-3275
2. Intel Xeon W-3275MIntel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3275M vs Intel Xeon W-3275
3. Intel Core i9-12900KIntel Xeon W-3275 Intel Core i9-12900K vs Intel Xeon W-3275
4. Intel Xeon W-3175XIntel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3175X vs Intel Xeon W-3275
5. AMD EPYC 7F72AMD EPYC 7402P AMD EPYC 7F72 vs AMD EPYC 7402P
6. AMD EPYC 7F52AMD EPYC 7F72 AMD EPYC 7F52 vs AMD EPYC 7F72
7. AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WXIntel Xeon W-3275 AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Intel Xeon W-3275
8. Intel Xeon Gold 6242RAMD EPYC 7F72 Intel Xeon Gold 6242R vs AMD EPYC 7F72
9. AMD Ryzen 9 3950XIntel Xeon W-3275 AMD Ryzen 9 3950X vs Intel Xeon W-3275
10. Intel Xeon W-3275AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Intel Xeon W-3275 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
11. Intel Xeon W-3275AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Intel Xeon W-3275 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
12. AMD EPYC 7F72Intel Xeon Platinum 8268 AMD EPYC 7F72 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8268
13. AMD EPYC 7742Intel Xeon W-3275 AMD EPYC 7742 vs Intel Xeon W-3275
14. AMD EPYC 7F72Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 AMD EPYC 7F72 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8280
15. AMD EPYC 7F72Intel Xeon W-3275 AMD EPYC 7F72 vs Intel Xeon W-3275


back to index