Intel Xeon W-1270P vs Samsung Exynos 9610

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Xeon W-1270P CPU1 vs CPU2 Samsung Exynos 9610
Intel Xeon W-1270P Samsung Exynos 9610

CPU comparison

Intel Xeon W-1270P or Samsung Exynos 9610 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Intel Xeon W-1270P has 8 cores with 16 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 5.10 GHz. Up to 128 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Xeon W-1270P was released in Q2/2020.

The Samsung Exynos 9610 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 9610 was released in Q4/2018.
Intel Xeon W (83) Family Samsung Exynos (47)
Intel Xeon W-1200 (13) CPU group Samsung Exynos 9600 (3)
10 Generation 3
Comet Lake W Architecture Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Xeon W-1270P is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.80 GHz (5.10 GHz). The Samsung Exynos 9610 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.30 GHz.

Intel Xeon W-1270P Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9610
8 Cores 8
16 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
3.80 GHz (5.10 GHz) A-Core 2.30 GHz
4x Cortex-A73
-- B-Core 1.70 GHz
4x Cortex-A53

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Intel Xeon W-1270P Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9610
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

Intel UHD Graphics P630 GPU ARM Mali-G72 MP3
0.35 GHz GPU frequency 0.85 GHz
1.20 GHz GPU (Turbo) --
9.5 GPU Generation Bifrost 2
14 nm Technology 16 nm
3 Max. displays 1
24 Compute units 3
192 Shader 48
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
64 GB Max. GPU Memory 2 GB
12 DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Intel UHD Graphics P630 GPU ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VC-1 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The Intel Xeon W-1270P supports a maximum of 128 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 9610 can connect up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels.

Intel Xeon W-1270P Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9610
DDR4-2933 Memory LPDDR4X-1600
128 GB Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 0
46.9 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
Yes ECC No
16.00 MB L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache --
3.0 PCIe version --
16 PCIe lanes --
15.8 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Xeon W-1270P has a TDP of 125 W, that of the Samsung Exynos 9610 is --.

Intel Xeon W-1270P Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9610
125 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
95 W TDP down --
100 °C Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Xeon W-1270P has a 16.00 MB cache, while the Samsung Exynos 9610 cache has a total of 0.00 MB.

Intel Xeon W-1270P Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9610
14 nm Technology 10 nm
Monolithic Chip design Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 ISA extensions --
LGA 1200 Socket --
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q2/2020 Release date Q4/2018
428 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Xeon W-1270P to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 9610 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 1.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-1270P (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 (22%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-1270P (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 (12%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon W-1270P Intel Xeon W-1270P
8C 16T @ 5.10 GHz
1491 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
329 (22%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Xeon W-1270P Intel Xeon W-1270P
8C 16T @ 4.60 GHz
9612 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
1164 (12%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Intel Xeon W-1270P Intel Xeon W-1270P
8C 16T @ 5.10 GHz
1740 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
370 (21%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Intel Xeon W-1270P Intel Xeon W-1270P
8C 16T @ 4.60 GHz
8389 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
1095 (13%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Xeon W-1270P Intel Xeon W-1270P
Intel UHD Graphics P630 @ 1.20 GHz
461 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 @ 0.85 GHz
94 (20%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Xeon W-1270P Intel Xeon W-1270P
8C 16T @ 4.60 GHz
19264 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
2235 (12%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Intel Xeon W-1270P Intel Xeon W-1270P
8C 16T @ 3.80 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
171465 (100%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Xeon W-1270P Samsung Exynos 9610
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Samsung Exynos 9610Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
2. Samsung Exynos 9610Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662Samsung Exynos 9610 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
4. Samsung Exynos 1380Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 750GSamsung Exynos 9610 Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Samsung Exynos 9610
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 665Samsung Exynos 9610 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
7. Apple A14 BionicSamsung Exynos 9610 Apple A14 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 9610
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 730Samsung Exynos 9610 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
9. Samsung Exynos 9610Apple A13 Bionic Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Apple A13 Bionic
10. Samsung Exynos 9610HiSilicon Kirin 710 Samsung Exynos 9610 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710


back to index