Apple A14 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 9610

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Apple A14 Bionic CPU1 vs CPU2 Samsung Exynos 9610
Apple A14 Bionic Samsung Exynos 9610

CPU comparison

Apple A14 Bionic or Samsung Exynos 9610 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Apple A14 Bionic has 6 cores with 6 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.00 GHz. Up to 6 GB of memory is supported in 1 memory channels. The Apple A14 Bionic was released in Q3/2020.

The Samsung Exynos 9610 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 9610 was released in Q4/2018.
Apple A series (22) Family Samsung Exynos (46)
Apple A14 (1) CPU group Samsung Exynos 9600 (3)
14 Generation 3
A14 (Firestorm/Icestorm) Architecture Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53
Mobile Segment Mobile
Apple A13 Bionic Predecessor --
Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU) Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Apple A14 Bionic has 6 CPU cores and can calculate 6 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Apple A14 Bionic is 3.00 GHz while the Samsung Exynos 9610 has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 9610 is at 2.30 GHz.

Apple A14 Bionic Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9610
6 Cores 8
6 Threads 8
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
3.00 GHz
2x Firestorm
A-Core 2.30 GHz
4x Cortex-A73
1.82 GHz
4x Icestorm
B-Core 1.70 GHz
4x Cortex-A53

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Apple A14 Bionic Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9610
Apple Neural Engine AI hardware --
16 Neural cores @ 11 TOPS AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The Apple A14 Bionic or Samsung Exynos 9610 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

Apple A14 GPU ARM Mali-G72 MP3
1.46 GHz GPU frequency 0.85 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) --
11 GPU Generation Bifrost 2
5 nm Technology 16 nm
3 Max. displays 1
16 Compute units 3
256 Shader 48
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
6 GB Max. GPU Memory 2 GB
-- DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Apple A14 GPU ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
Decode Codec AVC Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VC-1 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The Apple A14 Bionic can use up to 6 GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 34.1 GB/s. The Samsung Exynos 9610 supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --.

Apple A14 Bionic Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9610
LPDDR4X-4266 Memory LPDDR4X-1600
6 GB Max. Memory
1 (Single Channel) Memory channels 0
34.1 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
No ECC No
12.00 MB L2 Cache --
16.00 MB L3 Cache --
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Apple A14 Bionic is 7.25 W, while the Samsung Exynos 9610 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

Apple A14 Bionic Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9610
7.25 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Apple A14 Bionic is manufactured in 5 nm and has 28.00 MB cache. The Samsung Exynos 9610 is manufactured in 10 nm and has a 0.00 MB cache.

Apple A14 Bionic Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9610
5 nm Technology 10 nm
Chiplet Chip design Unknown
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions --
-- Socket --
None Virtualization None
No AES-NI No
iOS Operating systems Android
Q3/2020 Release date Q4/2018
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Apple A14 Bionic to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.1 stars (11 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 9610 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Apple A14 Bionic Apple A14 Bionic
6C 6T @ 3.00 GHz
1590 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
329 (21%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Apple A14 Bionic Apple A14 Bionic
6C 6T @ 3.00 GHz
4247 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
1164 (27%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Apple A14 Bionic Apple A14 Bionic
6C 6T @ 3.00 GHz
2072 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
370 (18%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Apple A14 Bionic Apple A14 Bionic
6C 6T @ 3.00 GHz
4689 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
1095 (23%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Apple A14 Bionic Apple A14 Bionic
Apple A14 @ 1.46 GHz
749 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 @ 0.85 GHz
94 (13%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Apple A14 Bionic Apple A14 Bionic
6C 6T @ 3.00 GHz
628047 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
171465 (27%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Apple A14 Bionic Apple A14 Bionic
6C 6T @ 3.00 GHz
8514 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
2235 (26%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
Apple A14 Bionic Apple A14 Bionic
6C 6T @ 3.00 GHz
729968 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
0 (0%)

Performance for Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. The performance is given in the number (trillions) of arithmetic operations per second (TOPS).
Apple A14 Bionic Apple A14 Bionic
6C 6T @ 3.00 GHz
11 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Apple A14 Bionic Samsung Exynos 9610
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple iPhone 12
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple iPad Air (4. Gen)
Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Apple M1Apple A14 Bionic Apple M1 vs Apple A14 Bionic
2. Apple A14 BionicApple A12Z Bionic Apple A14 Bionic vs Apple A12Z Bionic
3. Apple A14 BionicApple A13 Bionic Apple A14 Bionic vs Apple A13 Bionic
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888Apple A14 Bionic Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Apple A14 Bionic
5. Apple A12 BionicApple A14 Bionic Apple A12 Bionic vs Apple A14 Bionic
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 865Apple A14 Bionic Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Apple A14 Bionic
7. Apple A12X BionicApple A14 Bionic Apple A12X Bionic vs Apple A14 Bionic
8. Apple A10X FusionApple A14 Bionic Apple A10X Fusion vs Apple A14 Bionic
9. Apple A14 BionicIntel Core i7-1185G7 Apple A14 Bionic vs Intel Core i7-1185G7
10. Apple M2Apple A14 Bionic Apple M2 vs Apple A14 Bionic


back to index