Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Apple A13 Bionic
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Samsung Exynos 9610
22 %
8C / 8T · 2.30 GHz
Apple A13 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 2.65 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Samsung Exynos 9610
30 %
8C / 8T · 2.30 GHz
Apple A13 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 2.65 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Samsung Exynos 9610
25 %
8C / 8T · 2.30 GHz
Apple A13 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 2.65 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Samsung Exynos 9610
34 %
8C / 8T · 2.30 GHz
Apple A13 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 2.65 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Samsung Exynos 9610
14 %
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Apple A13 Bionic
100 %
Apple A13
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
Samsung Exynos 9610
33 %
8C / 8T · 2.30 GHz
Apple A13 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 2.65 GHz
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 9610 | Apple A13 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Samsung Exynos (49) | Apple A series (27) |
| CPU group | Samsung Exynos 9600 (3) | Apple A13 (1) |
| Architecture | Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 | A13 (Lightning / Thunder) |
| Technology | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | ||
| Predecessor | Apple A12 Bionic | |
| Successor | Apple A14 Bionic |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 9610 | Apple A13 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 6 / 6 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 4x Cortex-A73 2.30 GHz |
2x Lightning 2.65 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Cortex-A53 1.70 GHz |
4x Thunder 1.80 GHz |
| L2-Cache | 8.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | ||
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 9610 | Apple A13 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | ARM Mali-G72 MP3 | Apple A13 |
| GPU frequency | 0.85 GHz | 1.35 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 3 / 48 | 16 / 256 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 1 | 1 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Technology | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Release date | Q3/2017 | Q3/2019 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 9610 | Apple A13 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Apple Neural Engine | |
| AI specifications | 8 Neural cores @ 6 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 9610 | Apple A13 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR4X-1600 | LPDDR4X-4266 (34.1 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 4 GB | |
| Memory channels | 0 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 9610 | Apple A13 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 6 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 9610 | Apple A13 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Android | iOS |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | ||
| Release date | Q4/2018 | Q3/2019 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Samsung Exynos 9610 is 3.0 stars (3 ratings), while Apple A13 Bionic has received 3.8 stars (188 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
6
Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
7
Apple A19
6C / 6T · 4.26 GHz
8
Apple A13 Bionic
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
9
Samsung Exynos 9610
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
