Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Processor N200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Processor N200
100 %
Intel UHD Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake)
HiSilicon Kirin 935
23 %
ARM Mali-T628 MP4
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
3DMark Timespy (iGPU)
534 entries
534 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Processor N200 | HiSilicon Kirin 935 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Processor N (9) | HiSilicon Kirin (29) |
| CPU group | Intel Processor N50/N100/N200 (5) | HiSilicon Kirin 930 (2) |
| Architecture | Alder Lake N | Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 |
| Technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | BGA | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Processor N200 | HiSilicon Kirin 935 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 4x Gracemont 1.80 - 3.70 GHz |
4x Cortex-A53 2.20 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Cortex-A53 1.50 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 4.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 6.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Processor N200 | HiSilicon Kirin 935 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel UHD Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake) | ARM Mali-T628 MP4 |
| GPU frequency | 0.40 - 0.75 GHz | 0.68 - 0.68 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 32 / 256 | 4 / 64 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 1 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 8 GB | |
| Technology | 10 nm | 32nm |
| Release date | Q1/2023 | Q4/2012 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Processor N200 | HiSilicon Kirin 935 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Processor N200 | HiSilicon Kirin 935 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (25.6 GB/s) | LPDDR3-1600 |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | |
| Memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 9 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 8.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Processor N200 | HiSilicon Kirin 935 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 6 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Processor N200 | HiSilicon Kirin 935 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Android |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2 | |
| Release date | Q1/2023 | Q1/2015 |
| Release price | 193 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Processor N200 is 3.4 stars (105 ratings), while HiSilicon Kirin 935 has received 3.0 stars (2 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Processor N200
4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz
9
HiSilicon Kirin 935
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
