Intel Core i3-10110U vs Intel Processor N150

The Intel Core i3-10110U, with architecture codename Comet Lake U, was introduced in the third quarter of 2019.

It is a mobile processor primarily designed for entry-level laptops and everyday tasks such as browsing, word processing, and media playback. Manufactured using a 14 nm process, it features an integrated Intel UHD Graphics (Comet Lake) graphics unit and offers a maximum memory bandwidth of 47 GB/s. It has 4 MB of Level 3 Cache.

This processor provides solid single-core performance, well-suited for everyday tasks, and its multi-core performance is sufficient for lighter multitasking scenarios. The Intel Processor N150, with architecture codename Twin Lake, is a more modern processor that launched in the first quarter of 2023.

It targets energy-efficient, cost-effective devices like entry-level notebooks or mini-PCs. Manufacturing is done using the more efficient 7 nm process. It integrates an Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Alder Lake) and offers a maximum memory bandwidth of 38 GB/s. This processor features 4 MB of Level 2 and 6 MB of Level 3 Cache.

Its single-core performance is comparable to the Intel Core i3-10110U. In the multi-core domain, the Intel Processor N150 shows significantly higher performance in Geekbench 6, while the Intel Core i3-10110U exhibits higher multi-core performance in Cinebench R23. Neither of the two processors is designed for demanding games.

Their respective integrated graphics units, the Intel UHD Graphics (Comet Lake) of the Intel Core i3-10110U and the Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Alder Lake) of the Intel Processor N150, are suitable at most for older or less graphically intensive titles at low settings. Despite the newer architecture of the graphics unit in the Intel Processor N150 and the higher memory bandwidth of the Intel Core i3-10110U, the differences in gaming performance are not significant for serious gaming.

Regarding power consumption and thermal design power (TDP), the Intel Processor N150, which is designed for very low power consumption, differs significantly from the Intel Core i3-10110U. The Intel Processor N150 is ideal for fanless designs and devices with long battery life, whereas the Intel Core i3-10110U typically has a higher TDP, which means higher power draw under load.

Due to its newer architecture and higher energy efficiency, the Intel Processor N150 generally offers a better price-performance ratio for the target group of energy-efficient entry-level devices. The Intel Core i3-10110U, as an older model, is often found in cheaper but no longer state-of-the-art systems.

The Intel Core i3-10110U is suitable for established everyday tasks and office applications when slightly higher power consumption is acceptable. The Intel Processor N150 excels with high energy efficiency, modern architecture, and good multi-core performance in Geekbench 6, ideal for fanless systems and devices with long battery life designed for basic tasks and light multitasking.

For modern, energy-efficient devices intended to handle basic tasks, the Intel Processor N150 is the better choice. For pure cost savings in older systems, the Intel Core i3-10110U might still be relevant.