Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron N5100 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron N5100
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.80 GHz
4C / 4T · 2.33 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron N5100
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.20 GHz
4C / 4T · 2.33 GHz
More benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
3DMark Timespy (iGPU)
534 entries
534 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5100 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | Intel Core2 Quad (19) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron N4000/N5000 (6) | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8000/Q9000 (16) |
| Architecture | Jasper Lake | Yorkfield (Penryn) |
| Technology | 10 nm | 45 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Desktop |
| Socket | BGA 1338 | LGA 775 |
| Predecessor | Intel Celeron N4100 | |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5100 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 4x Tremont | 4x |
| Frequency: | 1.10 GHz | 2.33 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.80 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.20 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 1.50 MB | 4.00 MB |
| L3-Cache | 4.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5100 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Jasper Lake) | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 0.35 - 0.85 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 24 / 192 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 8 GB | |
| Technology | 10 nm | |
| Release date | Q1/2021 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5100 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5100 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-2933 (46.9 GB/s) | DDR3-1066 (17.1 GB/s) DDR2-800 (12.8 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 8 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 7.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5100 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 6 W | 95 W |
| TDP (PL2) | 20 W | |
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 4.8 W | |
| T. junction max. | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5100 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | MMX, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1 |
| Release date | Q1/2021 | Q3/2008 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron N5100 is 3.1 stars (69 ratings), while Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 has received 4.2 stars (10 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
8
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
4C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
9
Intel Celeron N5100
4C / 4T · 2.80 GHz
Popular Comparisons
