Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 Benchmark, Test and specs
Last updated:
The Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 has 4 cores with 4 threads and is based on the 2. gen of the Intel Core2 Quad series. The processor uses a mainboard with the LGA 775 socket and was released in Q3/2008. The Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 scores 299 points in the Geekbench 5 single-core benchmark. In the Geekbench 5 multi-core benchmark, the result is 905 points.
CPU lineageThe segment in which we have classified the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200. Here you can see if it is a desktop processor or a mobile processor or which processor may be the successor of the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200. |
|
| Name: | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
| Family: | Intel Core2 Quad |
| CPU group: | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8000/Q9000 |
| Segment: | Desktop / Server |
| Generation: | 2 |
| Predecessor: | -- |
| Successor: | -- |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
The Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 is 2.33 GHz. The number of CPU cores greatly affects the speed of the processor and is an important performance indicator.
| CPU Cores / Threads: | 4 / 4 |
| Core architecture: | normal |
| Cores: | 4x |
| Hyperthreading / SMT: | No |
| Overclocking: | No |
| Frequency: | 2.33 GHz |
| Turbo Frequency (1 Core): | -- |
| Turbo Frequency (4 Cores): | -- |
Memory & PCIeThe processor can use up to 16 GB memory in 2 (Dual Channel) memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The memory type as well as the amount of memory can greatly affect the speed of the system. |
|
| Memory type: | DDR2-800 DDR3-1066 |
| Max. Memory: | 16 GB |
| Memory channels: | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| Bandwidth: | -- |
| ECC: | No |
| PCIe: | |
| AES-NI: | No |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the processor is 95 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. The TDP usually gives a rough idea of the actual power consumption of the CPU. |
|
| TDP (PL1 / PBP): | 95 W |
| TDP (PL2): | -- |
| TDP up: | -- |
| TDP down: | -- |
| Tjunction max.: | -- |
Technical details
The Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 is made in 45 nm. The smaller the manufacturing process of a CPU, the more modern and energy-efficient it is. Overall, the processor has 4.00 MB cache. A large cache can greatly speed up the processor's speed in some cases such as games.
| Technology: | 45 nm |
| Chip design: | Monolithic |
| Socket: | LGA 775 |
| L2-Cache: | 4.00 MB |
| L3-Cache: | -- |
| Architecture: | Yorkfield (Penryn) |
| Operating systems: | Windows 10, Linux |
| Virtualization: | VT-x, VT-d |
| Instruction set (ISA): | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions: | MMX, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1 |
| Release date: | Q3/2008 |
| Release price: | -- |
| Part Number: | -- |
| Documents: | -- |
4C 4T @ 2.33 GHz
buy now on Amazon and save!
Benchmark results
The benchmark results for the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 have been carefully checked by us. We only publish benchmark results that have been created by us or that have been submitted by a visitor and then checked by a team member. All results are based on and fullfill our benchmark guidelines.
Screenshots:
Screenshots:
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Celeron 1007U
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron 807
1C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
|
MediaTek Kompanio 500
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
4C 4T @ 2.33 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 7885
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
Intel Pentium 987
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core2 Duo E6400
2C 2T @ 2.13 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
Intel Core i3-4030Y
2C 4T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
AMD Athlon II X3 425e
3C 3T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron G1820TE
2C 4T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
4C 4T @ 2.33 GHz |
||
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
4C 4T @ 2.15 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core i5-2467M
2C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron N4020
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
Intel Core M-5Y10
2C 4T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
AMD Phenom II X2 B53
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron N6210
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
4C 4T @ 2.33 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core M-5Y70
2C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7880
8C 8T @ 1.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
4C 4T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.|
|
Intel Core i5-5300U
2C 4T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core i7-4600U
2C 4T @ 2.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
4C 4T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
4C 4T @ 2.33 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-3340M
2C 4T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i3-3210
2C 4T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i3-2120
2C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,357 entries
2,357 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,330 entries
2,330 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,290 entries
2,290 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
719 entries
719 entries
Leaderboards
In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.
The best desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best AMD desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best Intel desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best mobile processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best smartphone processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best gaming CPU
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Fastest integrated graphics ever
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
CPU with the best price/performance ratio
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Leaderboards
show more results
show more results
Popular comparisons
