Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron N5095A vs Intel Atom x7809C
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron N5095A
44 %
4C / 4T · 2.90 GHz
Intel Atom x7809C
100 %
8C / 8T · 3.60 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron N5095A
31 %
4C / 4T · 2.50 GHz
Intel Atom x7809C
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.40 GHz
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5095A | Intel Atom x7809C |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | Intel Atom (108) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron N4000/N5000 (6) | Intel Atom x7000 AL (7) |
| Architecture | Jasper Lake | Amston Lake |
| Technology | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA 1338 | BGA 1264 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5095A | Intel Atom x7809C |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 4x | 8x |
| Frequency: | 2.00 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.90 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.50 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 1.50 MB | 2.00 MB |
| L3-Cache | 4.00 MB | 6.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5095A | Intel Atom x7809C |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Jasper Lake) | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 0.35 - 0.75 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 16 / 128 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 8 GB | |
| Technology | 10 nm | |
| Release date | Q1/2021 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5095A | Intel Atom x7809C |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5095A | Intel Atom x7809C |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR4X-2933 (46.9 GB/s) DDR4-2933 (46.9 GB/s) | LPDDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 8 | 3.0 x 9 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 7.9 GB/s | 8.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5095A | Intel Atom x7809C |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15 W | 25 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5095A | Intel Atom x7809C |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| Release date | Q3/2021 | Q2/2024 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron N5095A is 1.2 stars (103 ratings), while Intel Atom x7809C has received 2.3 stars (3 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Atom x7809C
8C / 8T · 3.60 GHz
9
Intel Celeron N5095A
4C / 4T · 2.90 GHz
Popular Comparisons
