Intel Celeron N4500 vs Raspberry Pi 4 B (Broadcom BCM2711)

Intel Celeron N4500 and Broadcom BCM2711 are processors for fundamentally different fields of application.

While the Intel model is based on the Jasper Lake architecture and was primarily designed for inexpensive laptops and compact desktop systems, the Broadcom chip based on the Cortex-A72 architecture powers the versatile Raspberry Pi 4 B maker board. In manufacturing, the manufacturer Intel uses an efficient 10 nm process with two cores and two threads, whereas the Broadcom unit is manufactured in the older 28 nm process with four computing cores.

In single-core performance benchmarks, the Intel Celeron N4500 significantly outperforms the competing model, which noticeably increases response speed in everyday tasks. Graphically, both solutions with the Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Jasper Lake) or the Broadcom VideoCore VI unit are heavily limited and not suitable for demanding games.

The thermal design power of the Intel processor is a frugal 6 watts, which often enables silent cooling systems, while the Broadcom BCM2711 impresses with extremely low energy requirements for compact, self-sufficient projects. With a memory bandwidth of 47 GB/s and 4 MB L3 cache, the Intel solution offers a much higher data throughput than the Broadcom model with 13 GB/s without L3 cache.

The price-performance ratio is advantageous for the Intel Celeron N4500 for classic office applications, while the Broadcom BCM2711 remains the preferred choice for cost-effective experiments and educational purposes. In summary, the Intel processor is recommended for simple desktop tasks under Windows or Linux, whereas the Broadcom chip plays to its strengths in specialized control tasks and in the hobby sector.