Intel Celeron N4000 vs AMD A6-9225

The Intel Celeron N4000 was developed for the entry-level market of mobile devices and targets price-conscious users.

The manufacturing of this processor of the Gemini Lake architecture is carried out using the 14-nanometer process, which supports an efficient way of working. It features two cores and two threads. With a Level 3 cache of 4 megabytes and a maximum memory bandwidth of 38 GB/s, it offers a stable foundation for simple office tasks.

In common tests, the Intel Celeron N4000 shows functional single-core performance for its device class. The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 600 enables smooth video playback, but is hardly suitable for gaming. The thermal power loss is very low, which means the system often manages without active cooling.

In the overall rating, this processor is recommended for users seeking high energy efficiency for simple digital tasks such as word processing. The AMD A6-9225 uses the Stoney Ridge architecture and is intended for use in low-cost notebooks.

This processor is manufactured using the 28-nanometer process and also has two cores and two threads. It offers a Level 3 cache of 2 megabytes and a maximum memory bandwidth of 17 GB/s. Since no valid benchmark values are available for this model, performance is primarily defined by the hardware specifications, which are designed for basic computing operations.

The integrated AMD Radeon R4 graphics handles the display of visual content, but does not offer sufficient computing power for graphically demanding games. The thermal design is optimized for mobile devices, although energy efficiency is lower than that of processors with smaller manufacturing processes due to its design.

The AMD A6-9225 is a choice for users for whom a low purchase price of the overall system is the most important factor.