Intel Celeron N3160 vs Intel Processor N100

Intel Celeron N3160 and Intel Processor N100 in Detailed Comparison Introduction and Architecture: The Intel Celeron N3160 (Braswell) and the Intel Processor N100 (Alder Lake N) are designed for energy-efficient entry-level systems.

The N3160 is manufactured using the 14 nm process and features 2 MB of Level 3 cache. The N100 uses the more advanced 10 nm process with 4 MB of Level 2 and 6 MB of Level 3 cache. The graphics unit of the N3160 is the Intel HD Graphics 400, while that of the N100 is the more powerful Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Alder Lake).

Performance Comparison and Gaming: The Intel Processor N100 significantly outperforms the Intel Celeron N3160 in single-core and multi-core performance, leading to noticeably better system responsiveness and multitasking capabilities. Both are unsuitable for demanding gaming.

However, with its modern graphics unit and 38 GB/s memory bandwidth, the N100 offers significantly better graphics performance for media playback and very light games than the N3160 with 26 GB/s. Energy Efficiency and Price/Performance: Both CPUs are optimized for low power consumption, ideal for fanless systems.

The N100 delivers substantially higher performance with comparable energy requirements. The N100's price/performance ratio is significantly superior for most use cases due to its more modern architecture and performance. The N3160 is now only suitable for extremely budget-conscious scenarios. Summary and Recommendation: For most everyday applications, the Intel Processor N100 is the clear recommendation.

It offers higher performance and efficiency. The Intel Celeron N3160 is only suitable for minimal requirements.