Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron J4025 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron J4025
36 %
2C / 2T · 2.90 GHz
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
100 %
8C / 8T · 3.10 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron J4025
21 %
2C / 2T · 2.90 GHz
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
100 %
8C / 8T · 3.10 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron J4025
49 %
2C / 2T · 2.90 GHz
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
100 %
8C / 8T · 3.10 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron J4025
26 %
2C / 2T · 2.90 GHz
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
100 %
8C / 8T · 3.10 GHz
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J4025 | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | Mediatek Dimensity (38) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron J4000/N4000/N5000 (11) | MediaTek Dimensity 8000 4nm (1) |
| Architecture | Gemini Lake | Cortex-A78 / -A78 / -A55 |
| Technology | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | BGA 1090 | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J4025 | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 8 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 2x 2.00 - 2.90 GHz |
1x Cortex-A78 3.10 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 3x Cortex-A78 3.00 GHz |
|
| Core Cluster 3: | 4x Cortex-A55 2.00 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 4.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J4025 | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | ARM Mali-G610 MP6 |
| GPU frequency | 0.25 - 0.70 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 12 / 96 | 6 / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 1 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 8 GB | |
| Technology | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2017 | Q2/2021 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J4025 | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J4025 | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) | LPDDR5-6400 (51.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 8 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 6 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 3.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J4025 | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J4025 | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Android |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | |
| Release date | Q4/2019 | Q4/2022 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron J4025 is 3.1 stars (18 ratings), while MediaTek Dimensity 8200 has received 4.3 stars (53 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M4 (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 4.46 GHz
7
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
8
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
9
Intel Celeron J4025
2C / 2T · 2.90 GHz
Popular Comparisons
