Intel Celeron E3400 vs AMD FX-6200
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Celeron E3400 | AMD FX-6200 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Celeron E3400 or AMD FX-6200 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Celeron E3400 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.60 GHz. Up to 16 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron E3400 was released in Q1/2010. The AMD FX-6200 has 6 cores with 6 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.10 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD FX-6200 was released in Q2/2012. |
||
| Intel Celeron (165) | Family | AMD FX (30) |
| Intel Celeron E3000 (3) | CPU group | AMD FX-6100/6200 (3) |
| 1 | Generation | 1 |
| Wolfdale (Penryn) | Architecture | Zambezi (Bulldozer) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Celeron E3400 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.60 GHz. The AMD FX-6200 has 6 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 3.80 GHz (4.10 GHz). |
||
| Intel Celeron E3400 | Characteristic | AMD FX-6200 |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 2.60 GHz | Frequency | 3.80 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 4.10 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 4.10 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Celeron E3400 supports a maximum of 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD FX-6200 can connect up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Celeron E3400 | Characteristic | AMD FX-6200 |
| DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 | Memory | DDR3-1866 |
| 16 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 17.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 29.9 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| 1.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Celeron E3400 has a TDP of 65 W, that of the AMD FX-6200 is 125 W. |
||
| Intel Celeron E3400 | Characteristic | AMD FX-6200 |
| 65 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 125 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Celeron E3400 has a 1.00 MB cache, while the AMD FX-6200 cache has a total of 8.00 MB. |
||
| Intel Celeron E3400 | Characteristic | AMD FX-6200 |
| 45 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX |
| LGA 775 | Socket | AM3+ |
| VT-x | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q1/2010 | Release date | Q2/2012 |
| 42 $ | Release price | 95 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
6C 6T @ 3.80 GHz (4.10 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Celeron E3400
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
AMD FX-6200
6C 6T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3400
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-6200
6C 6T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3400
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-6200
6C 6T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3400
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-6200
6C 6T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3400
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-6200
6C 6T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3400
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-6200
6C 6T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Celeron E3400 | AMD FX-6200 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
