Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron E3400 vs AMD FX-6200
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron E3400
68 %
2C / 2T · 2.60 GHz
AMD FX-6200
100 %
6C / 6T · 4.10 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron E3400
31 %
2C / 2T · 2.60 GHz
AMD FX-6200
100 %
6C / 6T · 4.10 GHz
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron E3400
42 %
2C / 2T · 2.60 GHz
AMD FX-6200
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.80 GHz
More benchmarks
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3400 | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | AMD FX (30) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron E3000 (3) | AMD FX-6100/6200 (3) |
| Architecture | Wolfdale (Penryn) | Zambezi (Bulldozer) |
| Technology | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA 775 | AM3+ |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3400 | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 6 / 6 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x Core | 6x |
| Frequency: | 2.60 GHz | 3.80 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 4.10 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 4.10 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 1.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 8.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✓ | ✓ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3400 | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | ||
| CUs / Shader | / | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | ||
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | ||
| Release date |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3400 | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3400 | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1066 (17.1 GB/s) DDR2-800 (12.8 GB/s) | DDR3-1866 (29.9 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | Yes |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3400 | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65 W | 125 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3400 | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Unknown |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX |
| Release date | Q1/2010 | Q2/2012 |
| Release price | 42 $ | 95 $ |
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron E3400 is 3.5 stars (2 ratings), while AMD FX-6200 has received 4.7 stars (3 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
4
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
5
AMD FX-6200
6C / 6T · 4.10 GHz
6
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
7
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
8
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
8C / 16T · 4.60 GHz
9
Intel Celeron E3400
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
