Intel Celeron E3300 vs AMD EPYC 9654
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Celeron E3300 | AMD EPYC 9654 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Celeron E3300 and the AMD EPYC 9654 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the Intel Celeron E3300 2 core processor released in Q3/2009 with the AMD EPYC 9654 which has 96 CPU cores and was introduced in Q4/2022. |
||
| Intel Celeron (165) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| Intel Celeron E3000 (3) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 9004 (21) |
| 1 | Generation | 4 |
| Wolfdale (Penryn) | Architecture | Genoa / Genoa-X (Zen 4) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | AMD EPYC 9655 |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Celeron E3300 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.50 GHz. The processor can compute 2 threads at the same time. The AMD EPYC 9654 clocks with 2.40 GHz (3.70 GHz), has 96 CPU cores and can calculate 192 threads in parallel. |
||
| Intel Celeron E3300 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9654 |
| 2 | Cores | 96 |
| 2 | Threads | 192 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.50 GHz | Frequency | 2.40 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.70 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.55 GHz |
Memory & PCIeUp to 16 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the Intel Celeron E3300, while the AMD EPYC 9654 supports a maximum of 6144 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 460.8 GB/s enabled. |
||
| Intel Celeron E3300 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9654 |
| DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 | Memory | DDR5-4800 |
| 16 GB | Max. Memory | 6144 GB |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 12 |
| 17.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| 1.00 MB | L2 Cache | 96.00 MB |
| -- | L3 Cache | 384.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 5.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 504.1 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe Intel Celeron E3300 has a TDP of 65 W. The TDP of the AMD EPYC 9654 is 360 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| Intel Celeron E3300 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9654 |
| 65 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 360 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | 400 W |
| -- | TDP down | 320 W |
| -- | Tjunction max. | 100 °C |
Technical detailsThe Intel Celeron E3300 has 1.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 45 nm. The cache of AMD EPYC 9654 is at 480.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 5 nm. |
||
| Intel Celeron E3300 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9654 |
| 45 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 | ISA extensions | SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI |
| LGA 775 | Socket | SP5 |
| VT-x | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 |
| Q3/2009 | Release date | Q4/2022 |
| 47 $ | Release price | 11805 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
96C 192T @ 2.40 GHz (3.70 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Celeron E3300
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 9654
96C 192T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3300
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9654
96C 192T @ 3.55 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3300
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9654
96C 192T @ 3.55 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3300
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9654
96C 192T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3300
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9654
96C 192T @ 3.55 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3300
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9654
96C 192T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Celeron E3300 | AMD EPYC 9654 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
