Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Atom x6425E vs Intel Celeron E3400
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Atom x6425E
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.00 GHz
Intel Celeron E3400
53 %
2C / 2T · 2.60 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Atom x6425E
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.70 GHz
Intel Celeron E3400
30 %
2C / 2T · 2.60 GHz
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom x6425E | Intel Celeron E3400 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Atom (108) | Intel Celeron (165) |
| CPU group | Intel Atom x6000 (10) | Intel Celeron E3000 (3) |
| Architecture | Elkhart Lake | Wolfdale (Penryn) |
| Technology | 10 nm | 45 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Desktop |
| Socket | BGA 1493 | LGA 775 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor | Intel Atom x7425E |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom x6425E | Intel Celeron E3400 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 4x | 2x Core |
| Frequency: | 2.00 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 3.00 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.70 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 1.50 MB | 1.00 MB |
| L3-Cache | ||
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✓ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom x6425E | Intel Celeron E3400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel UHD Graphics 10th Gen (32 EU) | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 0.50 - 0.75 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 32 / 256 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 64 GB | |
| Technology | 14 nm | |
| Release date | Q2/2020 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom x6425E | Intel Celeron E3400 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom x6425E | Intel Celeron E3400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR4X-3733 (119.2 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (102.4 GB/s) | DDR3-1066 (17.1 GB/s) DDR2-800 (12.8 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 4 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 8 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 7.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom x6425E | Intel Celeron E3400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 12 W | 65 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom x6425E | Intel Celeron E3400 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 |
| Release date | Q1/2021 | Q1/2010 |
| Release price | 56 $ | 42 $ |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Atom x6425E is 3.0 stars (2 ratings), while Intel Celeron E3400 has received 3.5 stars (2 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Celeron E3400
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
9
Intel Atom x6425E
4C / 4T · 3.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
