Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Atom E3827 vs Intel Celeron E1600
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Atom E3827
60 %
2C / 2T · 1.75 GHz
Intel Celeron E1600
100 %
2C / 2T · 2.40 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Atom E3827
69 %
2C / 2T · 1.75 GHz
Intel Celeron E1600
100 %
2C / 2T · 2.40 GHz
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom E3827 | Intel Celeron E1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Atom (108) | Intel Celeron (165) |
| CPU group | Intel Atom E3800 (6) | Intel Celeron E1000 (4) |
| Architecture | Bay Trail | Conroe (Core) |
| Technology | 22 nm | 65 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Desktop |
| Socket | BGA 1170 | LGA 775 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom E3827 | Intel Celeron E1600 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 2x Core |
| Frequency: | 1.75 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | ||
| Turbo (All Cores): | ||
| L2-Cache | 0.50 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 1.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom E3827 | Intel Celeron E1600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 0.54 - 0.79 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 4 / 32 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | |
| Technology | 22 nm | |
| Release date | Q3/2013 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom E3827 | Intel Celeron E1600 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom E3827 | Intel Celeron E1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3L-1333 (21.3 GB/s) | DDR3-1066 (17.1 GB/s) DDR2-800 (12.8 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom E3827 | Intel Celeron E1600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 8 W | 65 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom E3827 | Intel Celeron E1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 |
| Release date | Q4/2013 | Q2/2009 |
| Release price | 58 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Atom E3827 is 1.0 stars (2 ratings), while Intel Celeron E1600 has received 0 stars (0 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
5
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Atom E3827
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
9
Intel Celeron E1600
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
