Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
HiSilicon Kirin 920 vs Google Tensor
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
ARM Mali-T628 MP4
Google Tensor
100 %
ARM Mali-G78 MP20
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
90 entries
90 entries
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
118 entries
118 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
AI performance (NPU)
218 entries
218 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 920 | Google Tensor |
|---|---|---|
| Family | HiSilicon Kirin (29) | Google Tensor (5) |
| CPU group | HiSilicon Kirin 920 (3) | Google Tensor (1) |
| Architecture | Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7 | G1 |
| Technology | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | ||
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor | Google Tensor G2 |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 920 | Google Tensor |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 4x Cortex-A15 1.70 GHz |
2x Cortex-X1 2.80 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Cortex-A7 1.30 GHz |
2x Cortex-A76 2.25 GHz |
| Core Cluster 3: | 4x Cortex-A55 1.80 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 8.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | ||
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 920 | Google Tensor |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | ARM Mali-T628 MP4 | ARM Mali-G78 MP20 |
| GPU frequency | 0.60 - 0.60 GHz | 0.76 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 4 / 64 | 20 / 320 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 1 | 1 |
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | 32nm | 5 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2012 | Q4/2021 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 920 | Google Tensor |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Google Tensor AI | |
| AI specifications | Google Edge TPU @ 1.6 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 920 | Google Tensor |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR3-1600 | LPDDR5-5500 (53.0 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 12 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 920 | Google Tensor |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 920 | Google Tensor |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Unknown |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Android | Android |
| Instruction set | Armv7-A (32 bit) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | ||
| Release date | Q3/2014 | Q4/2021 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of HiSilicon Kirin 920 is 4.0 stars (3 ratings), while Google Tensor has received 4.3 stars (79 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
6
Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
8
Google Tensor
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
9
HiSilicon Kirin 920
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
