Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Google Tensor vs AMD EPYC 9275F
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
90 entries
90 entries
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
118 entries
118 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
AI performance (NPU)
218 entries
218 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor | AMD EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Google Tensor (5) | AMD EPYC (147) |
| CPU group | Google Tensor (1) | AMD EPYC 9005 (29) |
| Architecture | G1 | Turin (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) |
| Technology | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Server |
| Socket | SP5 | |
| Predecessor | AMD EPYC 9274F | |
| Successor | Google Tensor G2 |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor | AMD EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 24 / 48 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) | normal |
| Core Cluster 1: | 2x Cortex-X1 2.80 GHz |
24x Zen 5 4.00 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 2x Cortex-A76 2.25 GHz |
|
| Core Cluster 3: | 4x Cortex-A55 1.80 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 8.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 96.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor | AMD EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | ARM Mali-G78 MP20 | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 0.76 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 20 / 320 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | 5 nm | |
| Release date | Q4/2021 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor | AMD EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Google Tensor AI | |
| AI specifications | Google Edge TPU @ 1.6 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor | AMD EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR5-5500 (53.0 GB/s) | DDR5-6000 (480.0 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 12 GB | 6144 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 12 |
| ECC | No | Yes |
| PCIe | 5.0 x 128 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 504.1 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor | AMD EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10 W | 320 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor | AMD EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Android | Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI | |
| Release date | Q4/2021 | Q4/2024 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Google Tensor is 4.3 stars (79 ratings), while AMD EPYC 9275F has received 4.0 stars (1 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
6
Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
8
Google Tensor
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
9
AMD EPYC 9275F
24C / 48T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
